Start Submission Become a Reviewer

Reading: Ambulatory Patients with Cardiometabolic Disease and Without Evidence of COVID-19 During the...

Download

A- A+
Alt. Display

Original Research

Ambulatory Patients with Cardiometabolic Disease and Without Evidence of COVID-19 During the Pandemic. The CorCOVID LATAM Study

Authors:

Ricardo Lopez Santi ,

Hospital Italiano de La Plata, AR
X close

Manlio F. Márquez,

Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia Ignacio Chavez, MX
X close

Daniel Piskorz,

Cardiovascular Institute of the Rosario British Sanatorium, AR
X close

Clara Saldarriaga,

University of Antioquia, Pontificia Bolivariana University, CO
X close

Alberto Lorenzatti,

Instituto Médico DAMIC/Fundación Rusculleda, AR
X close

Fernando Wyss,

Servicios y Tecnología Cardiovascular de Guatemala SA – Cardiosolutions, GT
X close

Alexander Valdés Martín,

Instituto de Cardiología y Cirugía Cardiovascular, CU
X close

Jorge Sotomayor Perales,

Hospital III EsSalud Juliaca, PE
X close

Jean Carrion Arcela,

Hospital Almanzor Aguinaga Asenjo, PE
X close

Elirub de Lourdes Rojas Gimon,

Clinical Center, VE
X close

Gustavo Sambadaro,

Sanatorio Jozama, AR
X close

Gonzalo Emanuel Perez,

Clinica Olivos, AR
X close

Ivan Mendoza,

Tropical Cardiology, Tropical Medicine Institute, Central University of Venezuela, VE
X close

Fernando Lanas,

Universidad de La Frontera, CL
X close

Roberto Flores,

Hospital Ramon Carrillo, AR
X close

Alvaro Sosa Liprandi,

Sanatorio Guemes, AR
X close

Bryce Alexander,

Queen’s University, CA
X close

Adrian Baranchuk

Queen’s University, CA
X close

Abstract

Background: SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has modified the cardiovascular care of ambulatory patients. The aim of this survey was to study changes in lifestyle habits, treatment adherence, and mental health status in patients with cardiometabolic disease, but no clinical evidence of COVID-19.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in ambulatory patients with cardiometabolic disease using paper/digital surveys. Variables investigated included socioeconomic status, physical activity, diet, tobacco use, alcohol intake, treatment discontinuation, and psychological symptoms.

Results: A total of 4,216 patients (50.9% males, mean age 60.3 ± 15.3 years old) from 13 Spanish-speaking Latin American countries were enrolled. Among the study population, 46.4% of patients did not have contact with a healthcare provider, 31.5% reported access barriers to treatments and 17% discontinued some medication. Multivariate analysis showed that non-adherence to treatment was more prevalent in the secondary prevention group: peripheral vascular disease (OR 1.55, CI 1.08–2.24; p = 0.018), heart failure (OR 1.36, CI 1.05–1.75; p = 0.017), and coronary artery disease (OR 1.29 CI 1.04–1.60; p = 0.018). No physical activity was reported by 38% of patients. Only 15% of patients met minimum recommendations of physical activity (more than 150 minutes/week) and vegetable and fruit intake. Low/very low income (45.5%) was associated with a lower level of physical activity (p < 0.0001), less fruit and vegetables intake (p < 0.0001), more tobacco use (p < 0.001) and perception of depression (p < 0.001). Low educational level was also associated with the perception of depression (OR 1.46, CI 1.26–1.70; p < 0.01).

Conclusions: Patients with cardiometabolic disease but without clinical evidence of COVID-19 showed significant medication non-adherence, especially in secondary prevention patients. Deterioration in lifestyle habits and appearance of depressive symptoms during the pandemic were frequent and related to socioeconomic status.

How to Cite: Lopez Santi R, Márquez MF, Piskorz D, Saldarriaga C, Lorenzatti A, Wyss F, et al.. Ambulatory Patients with Cardiometabolic Disease and Without Evidence of COVID-19 During the Pandemic. The CorCOVID LATAM Study. Global Heart. 2021;16(1):15. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/gh.932
  Published on 17 Feb 2021
 Accepted on 14 Jan 2021            Submitted on 04 Oct 2020

Introduction

During the current COVID-19 pandemic, international organizations and national health authorities proposed a community strategy to prevent and mitigate the spread of SARS-CoV-2, and almost all countries in the world adopted social distancing measures with different degrees of restriction [1, 2, 3, 4].

The fear of becoming infected with coronavirus, as well as the initial global public health statements urging people to stay home, led to a reduction in the number of visits and hospitalizations in patients with chronic non-communicable diseases [5, 6, 7]. Considering this, interest burgeoned in protocols for novel management of different pathologies [8, 9, 10]. This led health teams to presume that, in parallel to the COVID 19 contagion curve, there was another curve that was not being measured: one related to missed medical care in at risk populations [11].

In addition to these problems, Latin America presents a specific health issue, the impact of social determinants of health such as poverty, previously high unemployment rates, low educational level and fewer resources to combat the pandemic and its consequences [12]. These components increase the risk of social conflict and individual uncertainty with unpredictable psychological impact [13].

There is a question about the real state of affairs of patients with cardiometabolic disease but no clinical manifestation of Covid-19 in terms of lifestyle, adherence to treatments, and psychological symptoms during the pandemic [14].

Methods

The rationale and design of the CorCOVID LATAM Study was previously published [15].

Study population

The study population included patients with cardiometabolic disease being followed by a cardiologist in Spanish speaking Latin American countries. Eligible patients were those who did not have symptoms, signs, or suspicion of COVID-19. All gave their consent to answer a survey personally or by virtual platforms.

Informed consent

Patients were informed about the objective of the survey and the anonymity of their responses, and gave consent to answer it personally or by virtual platforms. Ethics approval was obtained from the Interamerican Society of Cardiology (IASC) Research Ethics Board.

Study design

A cross-sectional online survey consisting of 38 questions was developed using Google Forms (Mountain View, CA). Research staff administered the questionnaire to patients and then entered data online. In accordance with government measures to limit population mobilization, the survey was conducted either face-to-face, by phone, or by video chat, in which case informed consent was verbally taken.

The survey had seven clusters divided in two sections: 1. Questions that examine the patient’s demographic and cardiometabolic profile; 2. Questions that examine the patient’s behavior during the last 30 days. Questions contained dichotomous or multiple option answers. Answers were not forced, and respondents were permitted to select more than one response depending on the question content.

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), in its document ‘Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health’, physical activity is measured in minutes/week and times/week [16]. Low level of physical activity was considered as 2 times or less/week and less than 100 minutes/week, too.

Regarding fruits and vegetables consumption we measured in days/week and servings/day as per WHO. The international goals are 400 gr/day distributed in 4–5 servings/day (2 of fruit and 3 of vegetables). We considered very low intake less than three days/week and less than three servings/day.

Study distribution

The Interamerican Society of Cardiology opened the call for cardiologists of Spanish speaking Latin American countries to join as researchers on June 1st, 2020. Sixty-six investigators from 13 countries (divided in three geographic regions) applied and were approved:

Region 1 (North, Central, and Caribbean region): Costa Rica, Cuba, El Salvador, Guatemala, México, and República Dominicana.

Region 2 (Andean region): Colombia, Ecuador, Perú, and Venezuela.

Region 3 (Southern cone region): Argentina, Chile, and Paraguay.

The survey platform was open between June 15 and July 15, 2020 for the investigator team. Reminders were emailed daily to maximize the response rate, with information about the progression of the total surveys by country, as an incentive.

Statistical analysis

Data was described using means and standard deviations for continuous variables, and frequencies and percentages for categorical variables. Independent sample t-tests were used to compare the normally distributed continuous variables, the Mann-Whitney U test was used for non-normally distributed continuous variables, and the Pearson’s chi-squared test (or the Fisher’s exact test as appropriate) for categorical variables. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Multiple logistic regression models were constructed for comparisons, OR and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were provided to establish which variables are determining factors in the main negative changes observed in this population during the SARS-COV 2 outbreak. Data was collected in Google Forms. All statistical analysis was performed using Stata v. 13.1 (Stata Corp LP, USA).

Results

A total of 4429 surveys(s) were collected, 213 of which were discarded due to incomplete data, duplicate document, or non-meeting inclusion criteria. As such, 4216 were included in the database for statistical analysis distributed by regions as shown in Figure 1. The mean age of the population was 60.35 ±15.39 years old, and 2147 patients were men (50.9%).

Figure 1 

Distribution of surveyed by region.

Baseline socio-demographic characteristics are listed in Table 1.

Table 1

Descriptive analysis of socio-demographic characteristic of the population. Categorical variables are shown as percentages with counts in parentheses.

Baseline socio demographic profile Baseline habits profile

Region of origin Habits
  • ➢ North, Central, Caribbean
33.8% (1426) Smoking
  • ➢ Andean
32.2% (1359)
  • ➢ No-smoking
85.6% (3610)
  • ➢ Southern cone
33.9% (1431)
  • ➢ 1–10 cigarettes/day
9.0% (381)
Age (years) 60.3 (SD 15.39)
  • ➢ 10–20 cigarettes/day
3.9% (165)
Sex
  • ➢ More than 20 cigarettes/day
1.4% (60)
  • ➢ Male
50.9% (2147) Physical activity
  • ➢ Female
49% (2069)
  • ➢ None
38% (1605)
Education
  • ➢ Less than 3 times/week
34.4% (1454)
  • ➢ None
2.2% (96)
  • ➢ 3–6 times/week
14.9% (632)
  • ➢ Primary
19.1% (807)
  • ➢ Everyday
12.4% (525)
  • ➢ Secondary
32.1% (1355) Physical activity Min/week
  • ➢ Tertiary
15.3% (646)
  • ➢ Less than 100 minutes
44.5% (1164)
  • ➢ Academic
31.1% (1312)
  • ➢ 100 to 150 minutes
31.3% (818)
Occupation
  • ➢ 151 to 200 minutes
14.2% (372)
  • ➢ Housekeeper
4.6% (194)
  • ➢ More than 200 minutes
9.8% (257)
  • ➢ Public employee
18.1% (766) Alcohol intake
  • ➢ Private employee
19.4% (819)
  • ➢ Yes
42.6% (1797)
  • ➢ Independent contractor
6.7% (284)
  • ➢ No
57.3% (2419)
  • ➢ Academic degree
12.1% (512) Frequency of consumption (n = 1797)
  • ➢ Retired
12.5% (528)
  • ➢ Occasionally
68.2% (1227)
  • ➢ Unemployed
26.4% (1113)
  • ➢ Every week
17.2% (310)
Income level
  • ➢ Almost every day
7.7% (139)
  • ➢ Very low
10% (422)
  • ➢ Every day
6% (109)
  • ➢ Low
35.5% (1498)
  • ➢ Missing data
0.6% (12)
  • ➢ Middle
48.5% (2047) Frequency of intake of fruits and vegetables
  • ➢ High
5.9% (249)
  • ➢ Never
7.7% (326)
  • ➢ 1–3 days/week
34.8% (1469)
  • ➢ 4–6 days/week
22.7% (958)
  • ➢ Everyday
34.7% (1463)
Daily intake of fruits and vegetables
  • ➢ 1 serving
28.5% (1202)
  • ➢ 2–3 servings
56.7% (2393)
  • ➢ 4–5 servings
10.7% (451)
  • ➢ More than 5 servings
2.6% (111)
  • ➢ Missing data
1.4% (59)

Socio-economic and cardiometabolic profile

Among this population, 1920 (45.54%) belonged to the low and very low incomes group and 903 (22.4%) had primary education level or non-education.

Table 2 shows the cardiometabolic profile of the study population.

Table 2

Descriptive analysis of cardiometabolic profile of the population. Categorical variables are shown as percentages with counts in parentheses.

Baseline Cardiometabolic profile

CV History
Hypertension 72.8 % (3071)
Dyslipidemia 36.8 % (1555)
Diabetes 21.3 % (899)
Coronary disease 18.2 % (769)
Arrhythmias 16.9 % (714)
Heart failure 10.3 % (436)
Valvulopathy 8.2 % (346)
Peripheral vascular disease 4.2 % (181)
Cardiomyopathy 4 % (172)
Stroke 3.9 % (168)
Cardiac devices 3.8 % (164)
Other 2.3 % (99)
Last hospitalization due to a cardiovascular event
Never 51.3% (2165)
2020 11.1% (470)
2019 11.1% (469)
2018 7.0% (298)
2017 or earlier 19.3% (814)
Number of pills taken per day
Less than 4 67.0% (2825)
5 to 8 27.5% (1160)
9 to 12 4.8% (203)
More than 12 0.6% (28)

Among risk factors, hypertension (3071/72.8%), dyslipidemia (1555/36.8%) and diabetes (899/21.3%) were the most frequent.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) (769/18.2%) and heart failure (436/10.3%) were the most prevalent secondary prevention population.

Of the population, 1391 (32.9%) took 5 or more pills daily at the time of the survey and 2258 (53.56%) had at least one contact with the health team in the last month.

Lifestyles habits

Among the total population, 2611 (62%) performed physical activity, but only 629 (14.9%) met the minimum recommendations of 150 minutes per week. Only 562 (14.7%) had the recommended daily intake of four or more servings. Finally, 1797 (42.6%) were reported as habitual drinkers and 606 (14.4%) as current smokers.

Changes during the pandemic

The major changes in self-reported lifestyle habits are shown in Table 3, classified into 4 main items: physical activity, smoking, alcohol intake, and dietary intake of fruits and vegetables.

  • ➢ Physical activity and diet

Table 3

Changes in lifestyle habits in the last 30 days. Behavior is expressed as percentage of affirmative answers and in brackets the number of patients involved.

Physical activity n (%)

Changes in physical activity (n = 2611)
    It has been less than in the previous months 61.3% (1601)
    It has been the same as in the previous months 28.4% (742)
    It has been more than in the previous months 10.2% (268)
Have you used any app for training?
    Yes 21.3% (558)
    No 78.6% (2053)
Smoking

Changes in Smoking habit (n = 606)
    It has been less than in the previous months 33% (200)
    It has been the same as in the previous months 25.7% (156)
    It has been more than in the previous months 17% (103)
    Missing data 24.2% (147)
Have you considered Smoking cessation?
    Yes 52.3% (317)
Alcohol Intake

Changes in alcohol intake (n = 1797)
    It has been less than in the previous months 45.4% (816)
    It has been the same as in the previous months 34.7% (624)
    It has been more than in the previous months 11.3% (204)
    Missing data 8.5% (153)
Dietary intake of fruits and vegetables

Changes in fruits and vegetables intake (n = 4216)
    It has been less than in the previous months 27.9% (1177)
    It has been the same as in the previous months 49.8% (2103)
    It has been more than in the previous months 22.2% (936)

Among the population who regularly perform physical activity, 1601 (61.3%) reported less volume than the previous months.

The surveyed population reported a low consumption of fruits and vegetables 1795 (42.5%) 3 or fewer days/week and 3595 (85.5%) 3 or fewer servings/day. In the preceding 30 days, vegetable and fruit intake diminished in 27.9% of the surveyed population, did not change in 49.8% and increased in 22.2% of the patients, (Figure 2).

  • ➢ Tobacco and Alcohol
Figure 2 

Main changes in lifestyle habits.

In the current smoking population (103), 17% stated an increase in tobacco consumption but, as a positive finding, 52.3% reported they had considered quitting tobacco.

In the regular drinker population (1797), 11.3% stated they drank more, while 79% stated they drank the same or less quantity than they did before the pandemic.

Psychological symptoms

The perception of depression was reported by 1751 (41.5%) and was associated with low educational level (OR 1.46 CI 1.26–1.70; P < 0.01).

Other psychological symptoms were reported: weariness (2219/52.6%), decreased attention (1219/28.9%), sleeplessness or insomnia problems (2049/48.6%), and loss of interest in usual activities (3349/79.4%).

Univariate analysis showed an association between the perception of depression and low income (OR 0.48 CI 0.42–0.55; P < 0.001), sedentary lifestyle (OR 0.62 CI 0.54–0.70; P < 0.001), decreased food intake (OR 0.48 CI 0.43–0.57; P < 0.001) and perception of weight loss (OR 0.48 CI 0.41–0.56; P < 0.001).

Low-income was associated with a lower level of physical activity (P < 0.0001), less consumption of fruits and vegetables (P < 0.0001), more tobacco use (P < 0.001), and a higher perception of depression (P < 0.001).

Adherence to pharmacological treatments

A total of 1330 patients (31.5%) reported access barriers to pharmacological treatments, and 720 (17%) reported discontinuation of some medication (Figure 3). After applying multivariate analysis, secondary prevention status was significantly associated with this situation: peripheral disease (OR 1.55 CI 1.08–2.24; P = 0.018), heart failure (OR 1.36 CI 1.05–1.75; P = 0.017), valvular heart disease (OR 1.66 CI 1.27–2.17; P < 0.001) and CAD (OR 1.29 CI 1.04–1.60; P = 0.018).

Figure 3 

Percentage of patients who have had problems accessing some medication and patients with treatment discontinuation.

Perception of depression increased chances of discontinuing a medication (OR 2.01 CI 1.71–2.37; P < 0.001).

Details of univariate and multivariate analysis are listed in Table 4.

Table 4

Discontinuation of medication related to numbers of pills and cardiovascular antecedents.

Univariate Logistic Multivariate Logistic

OR crude 95%CI P value Adjusted OR 95%CI P value

Male sex 0.92 0.78–1.08 0.312 1.01 0.86–1.20 0.819
Pills per day
- Less than 4 Baseline N/A N/A Baseline N/A N/A
- 5–8 0.85 0.70–1.02 0.096 0.80 0.65–0.99 0.047
- 9–12 1.19 0.83–1.70 0.335 1.07 0.73–1.59 0.698
- More than 12 1.28 0.51–3.18 0.590 1.09 0.42–2.80 0.857
Cardiovascular History

Stroke 0.72 0.45–1.14 0.163 0.70 0.44–1.12 0.147
Peripheral vascular disease 1.54 1.08–2.19 0.015 1.55 1.08–2.24 0.018
Coronary disease 1.16 0.94–1.41 0.148 1.29 1.04–1.60 0.018
Diabetes 1.01 0.83–1.23 0.883 1.08 0.88–1.33 0.411
Hypertension 0.74 0.62–0.88 0.001 0.86 0.71–1.03 0.119
Dyslipidemia 0.81 0.68–0.96 0.016 0.85 0.71–1.02 0.084
Heart failure 1.44 1.13–1.84 0.003 1.36 1.05–1.75 0.017
Cardiomyopathy 1.49 1.04–2.15 0.029 1.30 0.89–1.91 0.172
Valvular heart disease 1.77 1.37–2.29 <0.001 1.66 1.27–2.17 <0.001
Arrhythmias 0.97 0.78–1.21 0.833 0.90 0.72–1.12 0.357
Cardiac devices 1.04 0.69–1.57 0.834 0.95 0.62–1.45 0.816
Depression 2.02 1.72–2.38 0.000 2.01 1.71–2.37 <0.001

Discussion

The main finding of our work was to demonstrate that a significant number of patients with cardiometabolic disease showed worsening of lifestyle habits, inadequate medical follow-up, frequent discontinuation of medications, and a worrying incidence of psychological symptoms. This was particularly apparent in the secondary prevention group.

A recent editorial by Robert Brook et al. analyzed the impact of major catastrophes on cardiometabolic risk factors. The authors proposed a strategy of anticipating, not just reacting to, the possible coming of a second crisis derived from the clinical worsening of cardiometabolic patients and suggested possible tools to deal with the problem [17]. The contribution of the Cor-COVID-LATAM survey aims to further these goals.

It behooves us to consider that inadequate follow-up increases the possibility of not detecting asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic disturbances in high-risk patients. Among our surveyed cardiometabolic population, 1958 (46.4%) did not have any type of contact with a healthcare provider despite the widely spread recommendations of not neglecting the care of chronic pathology. This situation is consistent with what has already been reported in Asia and Europe [18, 19].

Despite the current availability of virtual tools to guide patients in diet and physical activity, the health system was not prepared to respond adequately in a short time to reach thousands of patients [20]. Thus, only 558 (21.3%) among those who performed physical activity used web tutorials or apps. Inexperience in the use of telemedicine tools, and in many cases the non-existence of updated patient databases, increased the lack of connection between the health teams and patients with cardiometabolic disease, particularly in public health systems belonging to low and middle incomes countries [21, 22, 23]. The absence of adequate follow-up of patients lead to missed opportunities, such as that offered by 52.3% of active smokers, who reported that they had contemplated quitting smoking [24].

A relevant result of this study is the important number of patients discontinuing treatment. As it is well known, this increases the risk of events in a short period of time [25, 26]. During the last decade, adherence to cardiovascular treatment guidelines has been a highly debated topic [27]. Some evidence has shown that patients’ self-reports usually underestimate adherence issues. The FOCUS study demonstrated that adherence falls from 68% to 50.8% when investigators add pill count to the Morisky Green Test, a short survey that evaluates adherence [28]. Based on this, it is likely that non-adherence could be greater than that reported by patients in this study.

The maintenance of cardiovascular treatment is a complex challenge with different components. Among these, access barriers emerged as a major finding as 1330 (31.5%) reported difficulties in obtaining some medication. Similarly, data from the Prospective Urban and Rural Epidemiological (PURE) Study showed that in Latin American countries, secondary prevention drugs may not be available or affordable for a large proportion of communities and households [29]. For instance, at the time of this survey, most Latin American countries did not accept digital prescription of drugs, giving rise to a new barrier to access medication given the mobility restriction measures.

Another important aspect affecting cardiometabolic patients’ treatments was the controversial information in the press and social media about some medicines (e.g.: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blockers) as a potential gateway for the coronavirus [30, 31]. Despite the immediate position statement of many cardiovascular scientific societies, including the Inter American Society of Cardiology, strongly recommending to continue cardiovascular treatments, it did not completely avoid a lack of adherence to these treatments [32].

Since the beginning of the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2, potential psychological impact was of great concern [33, 34, 35]. This study demonstrated a significant percentage of patients reporting psychological symptoms. Among them, the perception of depression showed an association with social determinants of health such as low-income and educational level, factors that have previously been shown to enhance cardiovascular mortality [36]. We recently published the most detailed results regarding psychological impact and 1,590 individuals (37.71%; IC95% 36.24–39.19) were considered suffering major depression independently associated with female gender (OR 1.72; 95%CI 1.40–2.11; p < 0.0001), low physical activity <100 minutes weekly (OR 1.36; 95%CI 1.10–1.67; p < 0.004), and low fruits and vegetables intake (OR 1.46; 95%CI 1.05–2.03; p < 0.024) [37]. The consequences of these neglected aspects will surely be reflected in an increase in mental disorders such as major depression and stress, which have a proven relationship with cardiovascular outcomes [38]. A recent web survey of the UK Household Longitudinal Study (UKHLS) showed that mental health deteriorated compared to pre-COVID-19 times, and the authors commented on the need to generate policies that address special populations such as women, youth, and children in order to prevent future mental illnesses [39]. Early detection and proper treatment of depression are crucial aspects to start the resilience process [40].

Limitations

Among the limitations of this study are the absence of a random sample design to achieve a better representativeness of the participating countries’ population. Even though we were able to include more than 4000 patients, this is only a partial view of the continental situation, and probably, there is high regional and local heterogeneity. However, a significant number of surveys in a short period of time has allowed us to create a snapshot that reasonably expresses the situation of cardiometabolic patients in Latin America. Another limitation is that Brazil was not included in the survey, as the survey was limited to Spanish speaking countries. Finally, the self-reported variables may lead to bias, related to the type of survey and psychological status of patients during the interview.

Conclusions

A significant proportion of the surveyed Latin American patients with cardiometabolic disease but without clinical evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic showed a worsening of lifestyle habits, inadequate medical follow-up, frequent discontinuation of medications, particularly in the secondary prevention group, and worrying incidence of psychological symptoms. Some of them were related to low income and educational levels. These findings show the greater vulnerability of individuals living in middle-income countries during this unprecedented pandemic.

Additional Files

The additional files for this article can be found as follows:

Appendix 1

CorCOVID Survey. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.932.s1

Appendix 2

Investigators. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.932.s2

Competing Interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

References

  1. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020; 395: 497–506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5 

  2. MacIntyre CR, Wang Q. Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection for prevention of COVID-19 [published correction appears in Lancet. 2020 Jun 5]. Lancet. 2020; 395(10242): 1950–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31183-1 

  3. Bauch CT, Anand M. COVID-19: When should quarantine be enforced? [published online ahead of print, 2020 May 20]. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020; S1473-3099(20)30428-X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30428-X 

  4. Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, et al. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. Lancet. 2020; 395: 912–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8 

  5. Boukhris M, Hillani A, Moroni F, et al. Cardiovascular implications of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A global perspective. Can J Cardiol. 2020; 36(7): 1068–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2020.05.018 

  6. Pessoa-Amorim G, Camm CF, Gajendragadkar P, et al. Admission of patients with STEMI since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic: A survey by the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2020; 6(3): 210–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaa046 

  7. Burki TK. Cancer care in the time of COVID-19. Lancet Oncol. 2020; 21(5): 628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30201-1 

  8. Korytkowski M, Antinori-Lent K, Drincic A, et al. A pragmatic approach to inpatient diabetes management during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020; 105(9): dgaa342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaa342 

  9. Day AT, Sher DJ, Lee RC, et al. Head and neck oncology during the COVID-19 pandemic: Reconsidering traditional treatment paradigms in light of new surgical and other multilevel risks. Oral Oncol. 2020; 105: 104684. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104684 

  10. Bhaskar S, Bradley S, Israeli-Korn S, et al. Chronic Neurology in COVID-19 Era: Clinical Considerations and Recommendations From the REPROGRAM Consortium. Front Neurol. 2020; 11: 664. Published 2020 Jun 24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00664 

  11. Chalasani M, Nasir K, Gupta MD, Kalra A. The Covid-19 pandemic and India’s cardiovascular disease burden: Finding the right balance [published online ahead of print, 2020 May 15]. Indian J Med Ethics. 2020; V(3): 1–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2020.059 

  12. Pinilla-Roncancio M. The reality of disability: Multidimensional poverty of people with disability and their families in Latin America. Disabil Health J. 2018; 11(3): 398–404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.12.007 

  13. Holmes EA, O’Connor RC, Perry VH, et al. Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020; 7(6): 547–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30168-1 

  14. Brook RD, Levy P, Rajagopalan S. Cardiometabolic risk factor control during times of crises and beyond. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020; 13(7): e006815. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.006815 

  15. Santi RL, Piskorz DL, Marquez MF, et al. Impact of the pandemic on non-infected cardiometabolic patients. A survey in countries of Latin America rationale and design of CorCOVID LATAM Study [published online ahead of print, 2020 Aug 28]. CJC Open. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2020.08.007 

  16. World Health Organization. Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241599979 (Last visit 09/dec/2020). 

  17. Brook RD, Levy P, Rajagopalan S. Cardiometabolic risk factor control during times of crises and beyond. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020; 13(7): e006815. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.006815 

  18. Tam CF, Cheung KS, Lam S, et al. Impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak on ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction care in Hong Kong, China. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020; 13(4): e006631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.006631 

  19. Huet F, Prieur C, Schurtz G, et al. One train may hide another: Acute cardiovascular diseases could be neglected because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2020; 113(5): 303–07. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acvd.2020.04.002 

  20. American Heart Association. Cardiovascular disease risk reduction across healthcare settings: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association [published online ahead of print, 2020 Aug 7]. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020; HCQ0000000000000094. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/HCQ.0000000000000094 

  21. Julien HM, Eberly LA, Adusumalli S. Telemedicine and the forgotten America. Circulation. 2020; 142(4): 312–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.048535 

  22. Curioso WH. Building capacity and training for digital health: Challenges and opportunities in Latin America. J Med Internet Res. 2019; 21(12): e16513. Published 2019 Dec 18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.16513 

  23. Novillo-Ortiz D, Dumit EM, D’Agostino M, et al. Digital health in the Americas: Advances and challenges in connected health. BMJ Innov. 2018; 4(3): 123–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjinnov-2017-000258 

  24. Kowitt SD, Cornacchione Ross J, Jarman KL, et al. Tobacco quit intentions and behaviors among cigar smokers in the United States in response to COVID-19. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(15): 5368. Published 2020 Jul 25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155368 

  25. Giral P, Neumann A, Weill A, Coste J. Cardiovascular effect of discontinuing statins for primary prevention at the age of 75 years: A nationwide population-based cohort study in France. Eur Heart J. 2019; 40(43): 3516–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz458 

  26. Sundström J, Hedberg J, Thuresson M, Aarskog P, Johannesen KM, Oldgren J. Low-Dose aspirin discontinuation and risk of cardiovascular events: A Swedish Nationwide, population-based cohort study. Circulation. 2017; 136(13): 1183–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028321 

  27. Booth JN 3rd, Colantonio LD, Chen L, et al. Statin discontinuation, reinitiation, and persistence patterns among medicare beneficiaries after myocardial infarction: A cohort study. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017; 10(10): e003626. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.003626 

  28. Castellano JM, Sanz G, Peñalvo JL, et al. A polypill strategy to improve adherence: Results from the FOCUS project. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 64(20): 2071–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.08.021 

  29. Khatib R, McKee M, Shannon H, Chow C, Rangarajan S, Teo K, et al. Availability and affordability of cardiovascular disease medicines and their effect on use in high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries: An analysis of the PURE study data. Lancet. 2016; 387(10013): 61–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00469-9 

  30. Cannata F, Chiarito M, Reimers B, et al. Continuation versus discontinuation of ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers in COVID-19: Effects on blood pressure control and mortality [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jun 5]. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2020; pvaa056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaa056 

  31. Danser AHJ, Epstein M, Batlle D. Renin-Angiotensin system blockers and the COVID-19 pandemic: At present there is no evidence to abandon renin-angiotensin system blockers. Hypertension. 2020; 75(6): 1382–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15082 

  32. Zhang X, Yu J, Pan LY, Jiang HY. ACEI/ARB use and risk of infection or severity or mortality of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pharmacol Res. 2020; 158: 104927. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2020.104927 

  33. Wang C, Pan R, Wan X, et al. Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(5): 1729. Published 2020 Mar 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051729 

  34. Cao W, Fang Z, Hou G, et al. The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China. Psychiatry Res. 2020; 287: 112934. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112934 

  35. Lima CKT, Carvalho PMM, Lima IAAS, et al. The emotional impact of coronavirus 2019-nCoV (new Coronavirus disease). Psychiatry Res. 2020; 287: 112915. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112915 

  36. Lazzarino AI, Hamer M, Stamatakis E, Steptoe A. Low socioeconomic status and psychological distress as synergistic predictors of mortality from stroke and coronary heart disease. Psychosom Med. 2013; 75(3): 311–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0b013e3182898e6d 

  37. Piskorz D, Barragán AP, Santi RL, Vázquez G, Ortiz GS, Zambrano LR, et al. Psychological impact of the pandemic on ambulatory cardiometabolic patients without evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The CorCOVID Latam Psy Study. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2020 Nov 2; 100737. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2020.100737 

  38. Sumner JA, Khodneva Y, Muntner P, et al. Effects of concurrent depressive symptoms and perceived stress on cardiovascular risk in low- and high-income participants: Findings from the reasons for geographical and racial differences in stroke (REGARDS) Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016; 5(10): e003930. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003930 

  39. Pierce M, Hope H, Ford T, et al. Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal probability sample survey of the UK population [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jul 21]. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020; S2215-0366(20)30308-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30308-4 

  40. Lopez Santi R. The development of resilience as behavioral support for chronic disease carriers: Perspectives during COVID-19. J Electrocardiol. 2020 (In Press). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.08.018 

comments powered by Disqus