Original Research

Incremental Prognostic Value of Anemia in Acute Coronary Syndrome from A Rural Hospital in India

Authors: {'first_name': 'Anjalee', 'last_name': 'Chiwhane'},{'first_name': 'Shreerang', 'last_name': 'Burchundi'},{'first_name': 'Gajendra', 'last_name': 'Manakshe'},{'first_name': 'Hemant', 'last_name': 'Kulkarni'}


Background: Anemia is highly prevalent in low- and middle-income countries, where prevalence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is also rising. Evidence indicates that baseline anemia status can prognosticate ACS. However, the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score that is popularly used all over the world does not include information on anemia.

Objectives: Our objective was to investigate if anemia at admission, along with the GRACE score, improves the prediction of adverse outcomes within 6 months in rural Indian patients of ACS.

Methods: We enrolled 200 ACS patients at the Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital—a rural, tertiary care hospital in central India. Patients were followed for 6 months for death and major adverse cardiac event (MACE). Improvement in the prediction of adverse events by including anemia in addition to the GRACE score was quantified using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and the net reclassification index (NRI).

Results: There were 31 deaths due to MACE and an additional 28 non-fatal MACE events during follow-up. Baseline hemoglobin was strongly and independently associated with both outcomes even after adjusting for a multivariable propensity score. For the outcome of death and death/MACE there was a moderate improvement in the AUC of 1% and 6%, respectively. However, for these outcomes the IDI for baseline hemoglobin was 6% (p = 0.03) and 12% (p << 0.0001), respectively, while the NRI was 0.50 (p = 0.01) and 0.78 (p << 0.0001), respectively.

Conclusions: Inclusion of baseline anemia in addition to the GRACE score improves prognostication of ACS patients.

Keywords: acute coronary syndromeoutcomesepidemiologyanemia 
DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/gh.527
 Accepted on 23 Oct 2019            Submitted on 17 Jan 2019


Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) represents a grim challenge to global cardiovascular health. An estimated 129 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) and seven million deaths are annually attributed to ischemic heart disease globally [1, 2]. Nearly two-thirds of the DALYs and half of the IHD-related deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) [3]. In this context, it is noteworthy that low socio-economic status has been identified as a significant risk factor for occurrence and consequences of ACS in countries like India [3, 4, 5].

The significant differences between the ACS profiles in high income countries versus LMICs can be explained by the differences in the comorbidity pattern. Roy et al. [6] have demonstrated that the comorbidity patterns in countries with high versus low Human Development Index are vastly different. Emerging data from Indian studies show that the presence of anemia is associated with adverse outcomes after ACS [7, 8]. Considering the high prevalence of anemia in India, especially in the rural populations, it is conceivable that the presence of anemia may contribute to ACS-related morbidity and mortality in these settings.

There is a strong biological rationale for anemia as a prognostic predictor in ACS patients. Reduced ability to carry oxygen to an already under-perfused myocardium [9], impaired vascular healing [10], increased inflammatory influx [11], heightened risk of thrombosis [12], need for whole blood or packed cell transfusions [13], and differing medication profiles [14, 15] can all contribute to adverse outcomes in ACS patients with anemia. Considering these mechanistic explanations, anemia can be expected to influence both short-term and long-term outcomes after ACS [16, 17, 18]. In an elegant meta-analysis of 19 published studies covering data on 241,293 ACS patients, Liu et al. [19] concluded that anemia is an independent predictor of adverse outcomes and should be used for risk-stratification in ACS patients.

A popular method for risk stratification of ACS is the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score [20] which is based on data from approximately 250 hospitals representing 30 countries (http://www.outcomes-umassmed.org/GRACE/). It uses the following nine predictors: age, development (or history) of heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, systolic blood pressure, Killip class, initial serum creatinine concentration, elevated initial cardiac markers, cardiac arrest on admission, and ST segment deviation. This score does not include anemia as a possible independent and additive prognosticator. In this study, we tested the following hypotheses in a rural, tertiary care hospital in India: a) baseline hemoglobin concentration is an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes in ACS patients; and b) baseline anemia in addition to the GRACE score will improve the overall prognostic performance to predict adverse outcomes within six months of hospital admission.


Study population

This was a cross-sectional study with a six-month long follow-up for adverse outcomes after ACS. All consecutive patients of ACS who were admitted between 1st November 2014 to 31st December 2015 to the cardiovascular services of the Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital, Sawangi, Wardha, India were included in this study. The study center is a teaching, multispecialty, 1,390-bed tertiary care hospital located in rural central India. All the enrolled patients provided contact details for collecting the follow-up data at the end of one month and six months from the time of index hospital admission. All patients gave a written, informed consent for enrollment into the study. The study protocol was approved by the Central Ethics Committee for Human Research at the Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Sawangi, Wardha, India.

Outcomes and predictors

This study focused on two primary outcomes: a) death during six months of index admission and b) death or the first major adverse cardiac event (MACE) during six months of index admission. A MACE was defined as one or more of the following events: post-infarction angina (PIA, International Classification of diseases ICD-10-CM Diagnosis code I23.7), heart failure (HF, ICD-10-CM Diagnosis code I50), ventricular tachycardia (ICD-10-CM Diagnosis code I47.2) and ventricular fibrillation (ICD-10-CM Diagnosis code I49.01). Death was confirmed by a death certificate when available or was informed by the next of kin.

The predictor variables included body mass index (weight in Kg/height in m2); waist/hip circumference ratio; tobacco, alcohol and smoking habits assessed during personal interview; Killip class; presence of important comorbidities like diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, transient ischemic attack (TIA)/stroke; and concomitant cardiovascular disease. Hypertension was defined as history of anti-hypertensive drug use or a systolic blood pressure of ≥140 mmHg or a diastolic blood pressure of ≥90 mmHg. Dyslipidemia was defined as described by Chou et al. [21] Use of cardiovascular medications was also inquired into with a focus on the use of aspirin, β-blockers, statins, angiotensin receptor blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and potassium-sparing diuretic spironolactone.

GRACE score was estimated using the Fox equations for death and death/myocardial infarction [20] as described by Anderson and FitzGerald [22]. Baseline hemoglobin concentration was measured using automatic blood analyzer (Beckman-Coulter, Miami, FL). Anemia was defined as a hemoglobin concentration <13.0 g/dl in men and <12.0 g/dl in women [23]. Additionally, baseline serum creatinine and serum albumin levels were measured using RX-imola auto-analyser (Randox Laboratories, Kearneysville, WV).

Statistical methods

Descriptive statistics included mean and standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables and proportions for discrete variables. Association with the study outcomes was tested for statistical significance using Fisher’s exact test, Person’s chi-square test or analysis of variance (ANOVA). Multivariable association with the study outcomes was tested using logistic regression analyses. To test the robustness of the findings from the logistic regression analyses, we conducted propensity score analyses. Propensity score was determined as the predicted probability from sequential logistic regression models to ensure balance of the covariates across patients with and without baseline anemia. We used the package prop_sel (http://personalpages.manchester.ac.uk/staff/mark.lunt) for these analyses. Quintiles of the propensity score were then used as a covariate along with anemia to predict the study outcomes in a logistic regression framework. The optimum operating point (OOP) for the GRACE scores was determined as the point on the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) that was closest to the upper-left corner of the ROC plot. Incremental value of baseline hemoglobin concentration over GRACE score was determined by comparison of the area under the receiving operating characteristics curve using the DeLong, DeLong and Clarke-Pearson test [24]. We also report the bootstrap-based 95% confidence intervals for differences in the area under the ROC as recommended by Demler et al. [25] using the package comproc [26]. Lastly, we estimated the incremental discrimination improvement (IDI) and the continuous version of the net reclassification index (NRI) when baseline hemoglobin concentration was added to the conventional GRACE score [27]. All statistical analyses were conducted using the Stata 14.0 statistical package (Stata Corp, College Station, TX). Statistical significance was tested at a type I error rate of 0.05.


This study included 200 consecutive ACS admissions to the study center. A total of 28 patients developed MACE only while another 31 died. The observed primary causes of death were: cardiogenic shock (21), septicemia (3), ventricular tachycardia (2), acute left ventricular failure (1), cerebrovascular episode (1), aspiration pneumonia (1), congestive cardiac failure (1) and hypoxic brain injury (1). The study participants who developed either MACE only or died within six months of admission were more likely to be older than 60 years, females and belonging to Killip class III or IV (Table 1). A large proportion of the patients (69%) had ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). While diabetes (70.5%), hypertension (43%) and cardiovascular disease (ICD-9-CM Diagnosis Code 429.2, 26.6%) were the most common comorbidities, the rarer comorbidities of heart failure and TIA/CVE were more frequent in patients with adverse events (Table 1). The most striking difference between event-free patients and those with adverse events was observed for hemoglobin concentration – either treated as a continuous variable (p = 1.90 × 10–17) or as a dichotomous variable indicating anemia (p = 6.72 × 10–9). Use of cardiovascular medications showed a generally lower risk of adverse events but was statistically significant for β-blockers and ACE inhibitors only. PCI was done in a total of 18 (9.0%) patients and was not statistically significantly distributed across study outcomes.

Table 1

Bivariable association of the baseline characteristics of study patients with the outcomes.

Characteristic Outcome at the end of six months P value

No event (n = 141) MACE only (n = 28) Death/MACE (n = 31

Age [Mean (SD)], y 54.63 (12.31) 62.46 (14.21) 61.39 (13.12) 0.0013a
Males [n (%)] 109 (77.30) 13 (46.43) 16 (51.61) 0.0004b
Body mass index [Mean (SD)], Kg/m2 22.39 (2.11) 22.09 (2.30) 22.17 (2.22) 0.6825a
Waist/Hip Ratio [Mean (SD)] 0.91 (0.05) 0.90 (0.05) 0.91 (0.05) 0.7296a
Overweight—BMI ≥25 Kg/m2 [n (%)] 15 (10.64) 3 (10.71) 4 (12.90) 0.9369c
Number of Personal Risk factors [n (%)]d 0.4696c
    0 65 (46.10) 19 (67.86) 17 (54.84)
    1 42 (29.79) 5 (17.86) 7 (22.58)
    2 21 (14.89) 3 (10.71) 6 (19.35)
    3 13 (9.22) 1 (3.57) 1 (3.23)
Killip class [n (%)] 3.70 × 10–14c
    I 76 (53.90) 8 (28.57) 2 (6.45)
    II 61 (43.26) 11 (39.29) 11 (35.48)
    III 4 (2.84) 9 (32.14) 15 (48.39)
    IV 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00) 3 (9.68)
Acute coronary syndrome type [n (%)]e 0.3608
    STEMI 92 (62.25) 20 (71.43) 26 (83.87)
    NSTEMI 6 (4.26) 1 (3.57) 1 (3.23)
    UA 43 (30.50) 7 (25.00) 4 (12.90)
Comorbidities [n (%)]
    Diabetes 106 (75.18) 17 (60.71) 18 (58.06) 0.0790b
    Hypertension 86 (60.99) 13 (46.43) 15 (48.39) 0.2089b
    TIA/Stroke 0 (0.00) 2 (7.14) 3 (9.68) 0.0020c
    Heart failure 1 (0.71) 3 (10.71) 3 (9.68) 0.0041c
    Cardiovascular disease 41 (29.08) 4 (14.29) 6 (19.35) 0.1809b
Clinical chemistry at baseline
    Hemoglobin [Mean (SD)], g/dl 12.94 (1.89) 10.16 (1.70) 9.77 (2.59) 1.90 × 10–17a
    Anemia [n (%)] 63 (44.68) 26 (92.86) 28 (90.32) 6.72 × 10–9b
    Serum albumin [Mean (SD)], g/dl 4.38 (0.41) 4.51 (0.45) 4.50 (0.44) 0.1411a
    Serum creatinine [Mean (SD)], mg/dl 1.23 (0.18) 1.27 (0.17) 1.25 (0.22) 0.5892a
    Serum creatine-kinase MB [Mean (SD)], IU 69.11 (8.07) 68.46 (13.41) 72.97 (10.32) 0.9731a
Medication use [n (%)]
    Aspirin 121 (85.82) 20 (71.43) 23 (74.19) 0.0911b
    β-blockers 105 (74.47) 15 (53.57) 19 (61.29) 0.0489b
    Statins 110 (78.01) 21 (75.00) 18 (58.06) 0.0697b
    Angiotensin receptor blockers 16 (11.35) 2 (7.14) 0 (0.00) 0.1256c
    ACE inhibitors 53 (37.59) 7 (25.00) 4 (12.90) 0.0163c
    Spironolactone 6 (4.26) 0 (0.00) 1 (3.23) 0.8357c
PCI done 14 (9.93) 3 (10.71) 1 (3.23) 0.4663c

a estimated using analysis of variance; b estimated using Pearson’s Χ2 test; c estimated using Fisher’s exact test; d combinations of tobacco ingestion, smoking and alcohol intake currently or in the past; e STEMI – ST elevation myocardial infarction, NSTEMI – non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, UA – unstable angina.

Considering these observed bivariable associations shown in Table 1, multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. In the full model (Table 2), Killip class, history of TIA/Stroke, baseline hemoglobin level and statin use were significantly associated with death within 6 months. When we ran similar analyses for the outcome of death/MACE within 6 months, we found that only Killip class and baseline hemoglobin were significantly associated with this outcome. Together, these results indicated a significant and independent association of baseline hemoglobin levels with both the adverse outcomes.

Table 2

Results of logistic regression analysis for the multivariable association of risk factors with the study outcomes.

Covariate Death within 6 months Death/MACE within 6 months

OR (95% CI) p OR (95% CI) p

Full model

Age 0.98 (0.94–1.02) 0.376 0.99 (0.96–1.03) 0.745
Males 0.92 (0.32–2.62) 0.869 0.74 (0.28–1.89) 0.527
Killip class 11.0 (3.11–38.9) 2.0 × 10–4 10.2 (2.54–40.8) 0.001
Diabetes 1.18 (0.41–3.44) 0.755 1.61 (0.64–4.06) 0.307
TIA/Stroke 9.55 (1.01–90.17) 0.049 0.992
Heart failure 0.93 (0.14–6.15) 0.940 1.59 (0.14–18.1) 0.709
Hemoglobin 0.70 (0.54–0.91) 0.007 0.58 (0.44–0.75) 4.9 × 10–5
Aspirin use 3.73 (0.43–32.1) 0.230 0.69 (0.11–4.56) 0.702
β-blocker use 1.56 (0.37–6.66) 0.546 0.85 (0.25–2.82) 0.792
Statin use 0.23 (0.05–0.98) 0.046 1.10 (0.26–4.66) 0.893
ACE inhibitor use 0.39 (0.10–1.47) 0.165 0.67 (0.24–1.86) 0.444
Stratified propensity score adjusted model

Hemoglobin 0.72 (0.57–0.91) 0.007 0.55 (0.43–0.72) 5.4 × 10–6

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

To determine the robustness of these observations, we conducted propensity score analyses. Estimation of the propensity score permitted generation of a propensity score based on variables that were balanced across the anemia-driven subgroups (Figure 2A). This propensity score was approximately normally distributed in those who did or did not have baseline anemia (Figure 2B). The propensity score was a significant determinant of both the study outcomes. The significance value for association of the propensity score with death within 6 months and death/MACE within six months was 0.0601 and 0.0041, respectively (data not shown). When quintiles of the propensity score were included in addition to hemoglobin concentration as a covariate, we observed that baseline hemoglobin concentration was highly significantly (p = 0.007) associated with death within 6 months and death/MACE within 6 months (p = 5.4 × 10–6; Table 2, propensity score adjusted model). These results further affirmed the independent association of baseline hemoglobin concentration with both the study outcomes.

Figure 1 

Incremental value of baseline hemoglobin concentration in prognostication of ACS over the GRACE score. (A–B) Comparison of the ROC curves that predict death within 6 months (A) or death/MACE within 6 months based on GRACE score only (orange curves) or GRACE score as well as baseline hemoglobin concentration (purple curves). Difference in the areas under the two ROCs were estimated using a bootstrapping method as detailed in the Stata package comproc. Statistical significance was tested using the DeLong, DeLong and Clarke-Pearson test. AUC, area under the curve; ROC, receiver operating characteristic curve. (C) Incremental value of baseline hemoglobin concentration as assessed using the incremental discrimination improvement (IDI), relative IDI and the net reclassification index (NRI). Diamonds indicate point estimates and the error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. All the plots are color-coded for the two study outcomes. (D) Predicted probability of the study outcomes based on a combination of the dichotomized GRACE score and presence or absence of baseline anemia.

Figure 2 

Derivation of a propensity score to test the robustness of association of baseline hemoglobin concentration with study outcomes. (A) Sequential logistic regression models were used to ensure the balance of the predictors of baseline anemia across groups of patients with and without anemia. The standardized differences before and after adjustment are shown in blue and red circles, respectively. All the variables were adequately balanced after adjustment. (B) Kernel density of the propensity score across patients with and without anemia.

We then determined the incremental value of serum hemoglobin levels over and beyond the GRACE scores for the two outcomes. For death within 6 months, we observed a statistically nonsignificant improvement in the area under the ROC curve (Figure 1A) by addition of baseline hemoglobin levels (p = 0.6011), but there was a clear and significant improvement in the IDI, relative IDI (6%, p = 0.03) and NRI (0.50, p = 0.01) as shown in Figure 1C (red colored diamonds and bars). For the outcome of death/MACE within 6 months however there was a statistically significant improvement in the area under the ROC curve (Figure 1B), as well as IDI (12%, p << 0.0001) and NRI (0.78, p << 0.0001) as depicted in Figure 1C (blue colored diamonds and bars). These observations demonstrated a significant and independent improvement in the prediction of outcomes after ACS when baseline hemoglobin levels were added to the respective GRACE scores of the two outcomes.

From the perspective of clinical utility, we then aimed to stratify the study population into four exclusive groups based on a combination of the GRACE score and presence of anemia. The GRACE score OOPs for the outcomes of death and death/MACE within six months were 113.65 and 149.8, respectively. At these cutoff values, the sensitivity and specificity of the GRACE score to predict death within 6 months was 77.42% and 80.47%, respectively. Similarly, the sensitivity and specificity of the GRACE score to predict death/MACE within six months was 71.19% and 81.56%, respectively. Addition of anemia to the dichotomized GRACE score values yielded the four risk groups shown in Figure 1D. As expected, we observed that for both the outcomes, patients with a high GRACE score and presence of anemia were at a very high risk of developing the outcome. The observed probability of death and death/MACE within six months was 47% and 69% in this risk group, respectively.


Risk stratification and appropriate risk mitigation strategies are of critical importance to reduce the adverse outcomes after ACS [28]. To that end, the GRACE score remains the most popular method of risk stratification of ACS patients. A distinct advantage of the GRACE score is its generalizability since it is based on data from several countries around the world. However, the GRACE Registry data have little representation of rural communities with high prevalence of anemia. Thus, the applicability of the GRACE score in such settings is not well-established. Our results demonstrate that in rural settings where the prevalence of anemia is likely to be high, the prognostic performance of GRACE score can be significantly improved by additively considering the presence of anemia at baseline—a simple clinical measure that can be easily implemented even in the rural settings. It is notable that very few studies [29, 30] have attempted to extend the use of the GRACE score to rural settings, and those that have found a need to re-calibrate the GRACE score for such populations.

Our results concur with a burgeoning evidence that baseline hemoglobin measurements improve the prognostic ability of the GRACE score with regards to in-hospital and 30-day mortality [31, 32, 33], death/MI within 6 months [34, 35] or MACEs within 12 months [36]. None of these studies, however, are from a rural setting and have reported prevalence of baseline anemia to be <30%. To our knowledge, our study is the first one to report outcomes of ACS from a rural setting with a substantially higher prevalence of anemia (58%) at baseline. It is noteworthy that the prevalence of anemia reported here is in concordance with other Indian studies having similar patient profiles [7, 8]. Together, there now appears to be sufficient evidence to favor the inclusion of baseline anemia in a modified GRACE score for an improved risk stratification of ACS patients.

These findings are important in the light of the continued high prevalence of anemia, especially in low income countries. A large systematic review by Stevens et al. [37], based on 232 nationally representative surveys from 107 countries and 1.9 million hemoglobin measurements, clearly indicates the sustained high prevalence of anemia in Asian and African populations. In the context of acute coronary syndrome, Stucchi et al. [17] reviewed data from 9 published studies (a total of 110,616 patients) across the world, and observed that the prevalence of baseline anemia in ACS patients varied from 10%–43%. In comparison, the baseline prevalence of anemia in this study was 58.5%, in line with the expectation of a higher prevalence in India. In the context of such high prevalence of baseline anemia and its observed independent association with adverse outcomes, inclusion of anemia in a refined GRACE score deserves a closer look.

A limitation of our study is the relatively small sample size. We therefore determined the post hoc statistical power of our study to demonstrate improved prediction of the study outcomes by comparing the area under the ROC curve. Using the R package pROC [38], we found that to detect a significantly improved area under the ROC curve, for the outcome of death within 6 months, our study had a post-hoc power of only 21.40%; but for the outcome of death or MACE within 6 months, our study had a post hoc power of 71.97%. We anticipate more specificity of association with death or MACE rather than death alone (which can be a mixture of various causes of death). Moreover, while the area under the ROC curve demonstrated a moderate increase, both IDI and NRI estimates were strongly and significantly improved by inclusion of baseline anemia with the GRACE score. We thus believe that our study has adequate power to demonstrate the independent and additive association of baseline anemia with the study outcomes.


Our study points at a need to include baseline anemia as an additional component of the existing GRACE scoring system for prognostication of ACS. This may be especially important in settings where the prevalence of anemia is high. Future studies need to devise and validate the prognostic use of a modified GRACE score that includes baseline anemia.


ACS acute coronary syndrome
GRACE Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events
IDI incremental discrimination improvement
LMIC low and middle income countries
MACE major adverse cardiac event
NRI net reclassification index
OOP optimum operating point
ROC receiver operating characteristics

Competing Interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare.


  1. Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012; 380: 2095–128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61728-0 

  2. Murray CJ, Vos T, Lozano R, Naghavi M, Flaxman AD, Michaud C, et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012; 380: 2197–223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61689-4 

  3. Vedanthan R, Seligman B, Fuster V. Global perspective on acute coronary syndrome: a burden on the young and poor. Circulation research. 2014; 114: 1959–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.302782 

  4. Daivadanam M. Pathways to catastrophic health expenditure for acute coronary syndrome in Kerala: ‘Good health at low cost’? BMC public health. 2012; 12: 306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-306 

  5. Jeemon P, Reddy KS. Social determinants of cardiovascular disease outcomes in Indians. The Indian journal of medical research. 2010; 132: 617–22. 

  6. Roy A, Roe MT, Neely ML, Cyr DD, Zamoryakhin D, Fox KA, et al. Impact of Human Development Index on the profile and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndrome. Heart. 2015; 101: 279–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306389 

  7. Bhavanadhar P, Srinivasan VR, Oruganti SS, Adiraju KP. A Prospective Study on Prevalence and Causes of Anaemia in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 2016; 10: OC01–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2016/19091.8106 

  8. Naqvi SM, Rao TR, Chandra SJ. Haemoglobin Levels in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Admitted in Cardiology Intensive Care Units in a Tertiary Care Hospital. The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India. 2015; 63: 26–9. 

  9. Farhan S, Baber U, Mehran R. Anemia and Acute Coronary Syndrome: Time for Intervention Studies. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2016; 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.004908 

  10. Solomon A, Blum A, Peleg A, Lev EI, Leshem-Lev D, Hasin Y. Endothelial progenitor cells are suppressed in anemic patients with acute coronary syndrome. The American journal of medicine. 2012; 125: 604–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.10.025 

  11. Shacham Y, Leshem-Rubinow E, Ben-Assa E, Roth A, Steinvil A. Lower admission hemoglobin levels are associated with longer symptom duration in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Clinical cardiology. 2014; 37: 73–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.22215 

  12. Mamas MA, Kwok CS, Kontopantelis E, Fryer AA, Buchan I, Bachmann MO, et al. Relationship Between Anemia and Mortality Outcomes in a National Acute Coronary Syndrome Cohort: Insights From the UK Myocardial Ischemia National Audit Project Registry. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2016; 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.003348 

  13. Chatterjee S, Wetterslev J, Sharma A, Lichstein E, Mukherjee D. Association of blood transfusion with increased mortality in myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis and diversity-adjusted study sequential analysis. JAMA internal medicine. 2013; 173: 132–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/2013.jamainternmed.1001 

  14. Task Force on the management of STseamiotESoC, Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, Badano LP, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. European heart journal. 2012; 33: 2569–619. 

  15. Savonitto S, Morici N, De Servi S. Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndromes in the Elderly and in Patients With Comorbidities. Revista espanola de cardiologia. 2014; 67: 564–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recesp.2014.02.010 

  16. Guedeney P, Sorrentino S, Claessen B, Mehran R. The link between anemia and adverse outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Expert review of cardiovascular therapy. 2019; 17: 151–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14779072.2019.1575729 

  17. Stucchi M, Cantoni S, Piccinelli E, Savonitto S, Morici N. Anemia and acute coronary syndrome: current perspectives. Vascular health and risk management. 2018; 14: 109–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S140951 

  18. Uscinska E, Idzkowska E, Sobkowicz B, Musial WJ, Tycinska AM. Anemia in Intensive Cardiac Care Unit patients – An underestimated problem. Advances in medical sciences. 2015; 60: 307–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advms.2015.06.002 

  19. Liu Y, Yang YM, Zhu J, Tan HQ, Liang Y, Li JD. Anaemia and prognosis in acute coronary syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of international medical research. 2012; 40: 43–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/147323001204000105 

  20. Fox KA, Dabbous OH, Goldberg RJ, Pieper KS, Eagle KA, Van de Werf F, et al. Prediction of risk of death and myocardial infarction in the six months after presentation with acute coronary syndrome: prospective multinational observational study (GRACE). Bmj. 2006; 333: 1091. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38985.646481.55 

  21. Chou R, Dana T, Blazina I, Daeges M, Bougatsos C, Jeanne TL. Screening for Dyslipidemia in Younger Adults: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Annals of internal medicine. 2016; 165: 560–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/M16-0946 

  22. Anderson F, FitzGerald G. Methods and formulas used to calculate the GRACE risk scores for patients presenting to hospital with an acute coronary syndrome: Center for Outcomes Research. University of Massachusettes; 2014. 

  23. Blanc B, Finch CA, Hallberg L. Nutritional anaemias. Report of a WHO scientific group. World Health Organization technical report series. 1968; 405: 5–37. 

  24. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988; 44: 837–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2531595 

  25. Demler OV, Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB, Sr. Misuse of DeLong test to compare AUCs for nested models. Statistics in medicine. 2012; 31: 2577–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.5328 

  26. Pepe M, Longton G, Janes H. Estimation and Comparison of Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves. The Stata journal. 2009; 9: 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0900900101 

  27. Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RBSr., Demler OV. Novel metrics for evaluating improvement in discrimination: net reclassification and integrated discrimination improvement for normal variables and nested models. Statistics in medicine. 2012; 31: 101–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4348 

  28. Engel J, Damen NL, van der Wulp I, de Bruijne MC, Wagner C. Adherence to Cardiac Practice Guidelines in the Management of Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Literature Review. Current cardiology reviews. 2017; 13: 3–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1573403X12666160504100025 

  29. Bradshaw PJ, Katzenellenbogen JM, Sanfilippo FM, Hobbs MS, Thompson PL, Thompson SC. Validation study of GRACE risk scores in indigenous and non-indigenous patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndrome. BMC cardiovascular disorders. 2015; 15: 151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-015-0138-6 

  30. Zaky F, Brieger D, Ryan M, Pearson T. Application of the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) Risk Score to ACS Admissions in a Rural Hospital – A Retrospective Analysis. Heart, Lung and Circulation. 2016; 25: S30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2016.06.067 

  31. Meneveau N, Schiele F, Seronde MF, Descotes-Genon V, Oettinger J, Chopard R, et al. Anemia for risk assessment of patients with acute coronary syndromes. The American journal of cardiology. 2009; 103: 442–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.10.023 

  32. Correia LC, Souza AC, Sabino M, Brito M, Maraux M, Garcia G, et al. Hemoglobin Level Adds Prognostic Value to the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events Score in Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes. Cardiology. 2012; 121: 213–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000336954 

  33. Ang DS, Kao MP, Noman A, Lang CC, Struthers AD. The prognostic significance of early and late anaemia in acute coronary syndrome. QJM: monthly journal of the Association of Physicians. 2012; 105: 445–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcr258 

  34. Marechaux S, Barrailler S, Pincon C, Decourcelle V, Guidez T, Braun S, et al. Prognostic value of hemoglobin decline over the GRACE score in patients hospitalized for an acute coronary syndrome. Heart and vessels. 2012; 27: 119–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-011-0127-3 

  35. Ennezat PV, Marechaux S, Pincon C, Finzi J, Barrailler S, Bouabdallaoui N, et al. Anaemia to predict outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Archives of cardiovascular diseases. 2013; 106: 357–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acvd.2013.04.004 

  36. Zhang E, Li Z, Che J, Chen X, Qin T, Tong Q, et al. Anemia and Inflammation in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. The American journal of the medical sciences. 2015; 349: 493–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MAJ.0000000000000471 

  37. Stevens GA, Finucane MM, De-Regil LM, Paciorek CJ, Flaxman SR, Branca F, et al. Global, regional, and national trends in haemoglobin concentration and prevalence of total and severe anaemia in children and pregnant and non-pregnant women for 1995–2011: a systematic analysis of population-representative data. The Lancet Global health. 2013; 1: e16–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70001-9 

  38. Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A, Tiberti N, Lisacek F, Sanchez JC, et al. pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC bioinformatics. 2011; 12: 77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-77