Start Submission Become a Reviewer

Reading: Modifiable and Non-modifiable Factors Associated with Low Awareness of Hypertension Treatmen...

Download

A- A+
Alt. Display

Original Research

Modifiable and Non-modifiable Factors Associated with Low Awareness of Hypertension Treatment in Indonesia: A Cross-Sectional Population-Based National Survey

Authors:

Qisty A. Khoiry,

Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jatinangor, ID
X close

Sofa D. Alfian ,

Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jatinangor; Center of Excellence in Higher Education for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jatinangor, ID
X close

Rizky Abdulah

Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jatinangor; Center of Excellence in Higher Education for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jatinangor, ID
X close

Abstract

Introduction: Low awareness about hypertension treatment is recognized as a significant cause of treatment failure. Therefore, identifying its underlying factors is essential for developing effective intervention strategies. This study aims to identify the modifiable and non-modifiable factors associated with low awareness about hypertension treatment.

Method: This national, cross-sectional, population-based survey used publicly available data from the Indonesian Family Life Survey (IFLS-5) for 2014 among respondents with hypertension aged ≥15 years. Depression and insomnia, as modifiable factors, were assessed using the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies—Depression (CES-D) and the Patient-Recorded Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) questionnaire, respectively. Non-modifiable factors, such as sociodemographic information, were obtained from self-reported data. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between these factors and low awareness about hypertension treatment. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported.

Result: The study recruited 7,920 respondents, the majority of whom were female (53.8%) and aged <60 years (71.1%). The prevalence of low awareness of hypertension treatment was 87.1% (51.8% in women and 48.2% in men). Being an elderly (OR: 1.60, 95%CI 1.36–1.88), being irregularly blood pressure control (OR: 4.40, 95% CI 3.78–5.13), having depressive symptoms (OR: 1.35, 95% CI 1.12–1.62), having insomnia (OR: 1.31, 95% CI 1.11–1.53), and having low satisfaction with health care (OR: 1.28, 95% CI 1.08–1.51) were associated with low awareness of hypertension treatment. Surprisingly, respondents with strong religiosity (OR: 1.62; 95% CI 1.25–2.09) were more likely to display low awareness of hypertension treatment.

Conclusion: The main factors associated with low awareness of hypertension treatment are modifiable. Thus, health care professionals should integrate more patient-specific factors when designing tailored interventions.

How to Cite: Khoiry QA, Alfian SD, Abdulah R. Modifiable and Non-modifiable Factors Associated with Low Awareness of Hypertension Treatment in Indonesia: A Cross-Sectional Population-Based National Survey. Global Heart. 2022;17(1):56. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1143
112
Views
44
Downloads
  Published on 16 Aug 2022
 Accepted on 26 Jul 2022            Submitted on 28 Apr 2022

Introduction

Hypertension is an increasing part of the global burden of disease, which is more predominant in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) [1]. The current global trends in hypertension has increased from 650 million to 1.28 billion over the last three decades [2]. A population-based study on more than 90 countries revealed that the burden of hypertension has increased by 7.7% in LMICs but decreased by 2.6% in high-income countries (HICs) [3]. Globally, 8.5 million deaths were associated with uncontrolled high blood pressure due to unawareness of this condition [4]. In fact, awareness of hypertension treatment is reportedly lower in LMICs compared with other countries [5]. In 2017, Indonesia reported 91.3 million people with hypertension, which was responsible for 35% of all deaths [6, 7].

Uncontrolled blood pressure is predominantly frequent in LMICs, where health awareness is the weakest and mortality rates due to cardiovascular disease are the highest [8]. According to Indonesia Basic Health Research 2018, only 37% of Indonesians with hypertension currently have obtained control of their blood pressures, whereas 45.6% exhibited low adherence to hypertension treatment [7]. Low awareness of medication is reported to be associated with medication non-adherence [9, 10], which may lead to poorly controlled hypertension, high risks of complication, and increased health care costs [11, 12, 13]. Therefore, low awareness of hypertension treatment should be addressed due to the lack of symptoms of the disease.

Previous studies have reported several factors that may be associated with awareness of hypertension treatment [14, 15, 16, 17]. However, such studies have mainly explored non-modifiable factors. A previous study conducted in LMICs revealed that insurance status and income were significantly associated with awareness of treatment of hypertension [18]. Moreover, low levels of education were associated with low rates of awareness about hypertension treatment in LMICs but not in HICs [5]. However, the association of modifiable factors, such as satisfaction with health care, blood pressure control status, depressive symptoms, and insomnia, to awareness of hypertension treatment in Indonesia remains unclear.

The Indonesian Family Life Survey (IFLS) is a longitudinal socioeconomic and health survey in Indonesia, which represents approximately 83% of the Indonesian population [19]. Several studies that utilized IFLS-4 or IFLS-5 demonstrated the association of non-modifiable factors, such as socioeconomic status [20] and psychosocial risk [17], to hypertension in Indonesia. However, a clear evidence of which factors or foci are required to improve medication awareness of hypertension treatment in Indonesia remains lacking. Thus, identifying its underlying factors is essential to developing effective strategies for intervention. This study aims to identify modifiable and non-modifiable factors associated with low awareness of hypertension treatment in Indonesia.

Methods

Study design

This study used the national longitudinal and cross-sectional data of the fifth wave of the IFLS-5, which were collected from 2014 to 2015 and were publicly available since 2016. IFLS-5 used a multistage stratified sampling design that represents 83% of the Indonesian population conducted in 13 provinces, which are four provinces on Sumatra (North Sumatra, West Sumatra, South Sumatra, and Lampung), all five of the Javanese provinces (DKI Jakarta, West Java, Central Java, DI Yogyakarta, and East Java), and four provinces covering the remaining major island groups (Bali, West Nusa Tenggara, South Kalimantan, and South Sulawesi) with a response rate of more than 90% [19]. The IFLS collected extensive measures of basic sociodemographic, certain economic characteristics of all household members, and health status, including self-reported measures of general health status, symptoms, pain, and biomarker measurements of health. The ethical review boards have approved the IFLS of Research and Development (RAND) Corporation and Gadjah Mada University. Written informed consent was obtained from all respondents before data collection [19].

Study population

The total number of IFLS-5 subjects was 34,464 (aged 0 to >80 years). Data were obtained from subjects who were at least 15 years of age at the completion of the survey. Subjects with available data on blood pressure, depressive symptoms, and sleeping quality were included. Subjects with missing values for outcome variables were excluded.

Outcome measure

Subjects with hypertension were defined as having a blood pressure ≥140/90 mm Hg [21]. Blood pressure was measured three times at home by specially trained nurses using an Omron sphygmomanometer (HEM-7203) as the subjects were seated. The first measurement was taken at the beginning of the interview with two subsequent measures taken during the interview [19]. The average of the three measurements was used for analysis.

Awareness of treatment was defined by responses to the following question: In order to manage your hypertension, are you currently taking prescribed medication weekly? Those who answered yes were considered to have a high awareness of hypertension treatment, whereas the opposite is true for those who responded with no. Awareness of hypertension treatment refers to those who were aware of their condition, aware they need to have treatment, and receiving treatment for their condition [22, 23]. It is relatively different from adherence, which was defined as the process by which patients take their medications as prescribed, composed of initiation (when the first dose is started), implementation (the actual dose of the patient from the start to the last dose), and discontinuation (end of treatment) [24].

Potential factors associated with low awareness of hypertension treatment

The potential factors associated with low awareness of hypertension treatment were classified as modifiable and non-modifiable factors. Depressive symptoms, having insomnia, blood pressure control status, happiness status, having visited health care services, and satisfaction with health care were categorized into modifiable factors. Alternatively, non-modifiable factors consisted of gender, age, marital status, level of education, residency, coverage of health insurance, economic status, and religiosity.

A self-reported Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale was used to measure depressive symptoms [19]. CES-D contains 10 questions to assess the feelings of subjects, which are highly correlated with depressive symptoms [25]. Eight questions were focused on negative symptoms (e.g., I was bothered by things that usually do not bother me), whereas the two other questions assessed the positive symptoms of depression (e.g., I felt hopeful about the future). The subjects indicated the frequency that each item applied to them in the past week using a four-point Likert-type scale (0 = rarely or none of the time; 1 = some or little of the time; 2 = moderately or much of the time; 3 = most or almost all the time). The final score is calculated by summing all items after reversing the positive mood items. A subject with a total score equal to or above 10 is considered to have symptoms of depression [26]. The CES-D questionnaire was translated into Indonesian (forward translation), where two independently hired translators re-translated it into English (back translation) [19].

Insomnia was assessed using 10 questions from PROMIS [19]. Five items each were used to assess sleep quality and sleep impairment in the past week [27]. Each item was rated using a five-point Likert-type scale (0 = never/not at all; 1 = a little bit; 2 = somewhat; 3 = quite a bit; 4 = always/very much). Insomnia was defined as total scores of ≥21–40 [28]. The PROMIS questionnaire was translated into Indonesian (forward translation), where two independently hired translators re-translated it into English (back translation) [19].

Blood pressure control status was categorized as regular and irregular dependent on the subject’s response to the question, How regularly do you have your blood pressure checked? Happiness status was assessed using the question, Taken together, how you would say things are these days? Would you say you are very happy, happy, unhappy, or very unhappy? Those who answered very happy or happy were categorized as happy, whereas those who answered unhappy or very unhappy were categorized as unhappy [29]. Satisfaction with health care was assessed using the question, Concerning your health care, which of the following is true: it is less than adequate for my needs; it is just adequate for my needs; it is more than adequate for my needs? Low satisfaction with health care is equivalent to the response it is just less than adequate for my needs, whereas high satisfaction with health care is indicated by it is just adequate for my needs or it is more than adequate for my needs [29].

Sociodemographic factors were gender (men, women), age at the completion of the survey (less than 60 years for the non-elderly and more than 60 years for the elderly), marital status (currently unmarried and currently married), level of education (no education, elementary school, junior high school, senior high school, and university), residency (rural and urban), coverage of health insurance (no and yes), economic status (poor and non-poor), and religiosity (religious, non-religious). The total income of the family was used to measure economic status over the past 12 months in rupiah divided by family size (per capita income). Capita income was categorized per quintile. Religiosity was assessed using the question How religious are you? Those who answered very religious or religious were categorized as religious, whereas those who answered somewhat religious or not religious were considered as non-religious [29]. The subject was asked whether they visited any health care services one month prior to the survey to assess health care visit status (yes and no).

To determine whether subjects have comorbid disease status, subjects were asked the question, Has a doctor/paramedic/nurse/midwife ever told you that you had the following chronic conditions of diseases? with response options: hypertension, diabetes, tuberculosis, asthma and other chronic lung diseases, cardiac diseases(heart attack/coronary heart disease/angina or other heart diseases), liver diseases, stroke, cancer or malignancies, arthritis/rheumatism, uric acid/gout, depression, vision and hearing abnormalities [29]. Subjects who answered only hypertension were categorized as having no comorbidity, while subjects who answered hypertension and one to three other chronic disease were then categorized as having one to three comorbidities, and subjects who had more than four comorbidities were categorized as having more than four comorbidities.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the characteristics of the subjects. Awareness of hypertension treatment was estimated for each age group and gender. A chi-square test was performed to assess the univariate association between the characteristics of the subjects and the outcome. We conducted complete case analyses because the missing data were small. The potential factors found associated with the outcome at a significance level of p < 0.25 in the univariate analyses were included in the initial multivariate model. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to obtain the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) with manual backward elimination. The p-values were set at 0.05 for factors included in the final model. Subgroup analyses by number of comorbidities was performed in no comorbid, having one to three comorbidities, and having more than four comorbidities groups. The goodness-of-fit statistic was assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Pseudo R-squared value, which is the default value reported by Stata, is obtained as an equivalent to the R-squared reported in the linear regression. R-squared is a number that ranges from 0 to 1, which indicates the extent to which the combination of independent variables simultaneously influences the value of the dependent variable [30]. All statistical analyses were performed using Stata software version 14.0 for Windows.

Results

A total sample of 7,920 subjects without missing data on awareness of hypertension treatment was included in this study. The majority were female (53.8%) and aged <60 years (71.1%; Table 1). A high proportion of subjects displayed poor blood pressure control (80.5%), although most of them (90.8%) visited health care facilities in the last month. Approximately half of subjects were covered by health insurance (50.4%), resided in rural areas (57.6%), and graduated from elementary school (41.2%). Out of the total participants, 20.4% experienced depression, whereas 46.3% have insomnia.

Table 1

Baseline Characteristic of Study Population (N = 7,920).


CHARACTERISTIC NUMBER %

Awareness of Hypertension Treatment

    Low Awareness 6,895 87.1

    High Awareness 1,025 12.9

Comorbidity Status

    No Comorbid 5,134 67.1

    1–3 Comorbidities 2,441 31.8

    ≥4 Comorbidities 81 1.1

    Missing 264

Gender

    Women 4,263 53.8

    Men 3,655 46.2

    Missing 2

Age

    Non-elderly [<60 years old] 5,627 71.1

    Elderly [≥60 years old] 2,291 28.9

    Missing 2

Education Level

    No Education 1,021 13.3

    Elementary School 3,173 41.2

    Junior High School 1,099 14.3

    Senior High School 200 2.6

    University 2,208 28.7

    Missing 219

Marital Status

    Not Currently Married 2,138 27.0

    Currently Married 5,780 73.0

    Missing 2

Blood Pressure Control Status

    Irregularly 4971 80.5

    Regularly 1,201 19.5

    Missing 1,748

Economic Status

    Quintile 1 1,605 20.3

    Quintile 2 1,661 21.0

    Quintile 3 1,498 18.9

    Quintile 4 1,595 20.1

    Quintile 5 1559 19.7

    Missing 2

Health Care Satisfaction

    Low 1,837 25.3

    High 5,411 74.7

    Missing 672

Happiness Status

    Unhappy 857 11.8

Happy 6,391 88.2

    Missing 672

Insomnia

    Yes 3,353 46.3

    No 3,895 53.7

    Missing 672

Depressive Symptoms Status

    Not Depressed 5,768 79.6

    Depressed 1,480 20.4

    Missing 672

Residency

    Rural 4,460 57.6

    Urban 3,289 42.4

    Missing 171

Health Care Visit Status

    No 1,548 90.8

    Yes 156 9.2

    Missing 6,216

Coverage of Health Insurance

    No 2,105 49.6

    Yes 2,141 50.4

    Missing 3,674

Religiosity

    Not Religious 1,248 17.2

    Religious 6,002 82.8

    Missing 670

The prevalence of low awareness of hypertension treatment was 87.1% (51.8% in women and 48.2% in men). Level of education, marital status, economic status, and happiness status were negatively associated with low awareness of hypertension treatment (Table 2). Gender, age, blood pressure control status, satisfaction with health care, insomnia, depressive symptoms status, residency, health care visit status, coverage of health insurance, and religiosity were selected as potential factors associated with low awareness of hypertension treatment based on univariate analyses.

Table 2

Univariate Associations with Awareness of Hypertension Treatment.


CHARACTERISTIC LOW AWARENESS OF HYPERTENSION TREATMENT HIGH AWARENESS OF HYPERTENSION TREATMENT P-VALUE


N % N %

Gender 0.000*

    Women 3,568 51.8 695 67.9

    Men 3,326 48.2 329 32.1

Comorbidity Status 0.000*

    No Comorbid 4,865 70.5 269 35.3

    1–3 Comorbidities 1,977 28.7 464 61

    ≥4 Comorbidities 53 0.8 28 3.7

Age 0.000*

    Non-elderly [<60 years old] 5,007 72.6 620 60.5

    Elderly [≥60 years old] 1,887 27.4 404 39.5

Education Level 0.368

    No Education 876 13.1 145 14.5

    Elementary School 2,761 41.2 412 41.3

    Junior High School 960 14.3 139 13.9

    Senior High School 182 2.7 18 1.8

    University 1,924 28.7 284 28.5

Marital Status 0.910

    Not Currently Married 1,860 26.9 278 27.2

    Currently Married 5,034 73.1 746 72.8

Economic Status 0.251

    Quintile 1 1,396 20.3 209 20.4

    Quintile 2 1,462 21.2 199 19.4

    Quintile 3 1,309 19.0 189 18.5

    Quintile 4 1,395 20.2 200 19.5

    Quintile 5 1,332 19.3 227 22.2

Residency 0.000*

    Rural 2,924 42.4 660 64.4

    Urban 3,971 57.6 365 35.6

Health Care Visit Status 0.000*

    No 1,046 88.6 502 96.0

    Yes 135 11.4 21 4.0

Coverage of Health Insurance 0.000*

    No 1,892 51.0 320 60.0

    Yes 1,821 49.0 213 40.0

Religiosity 0.000*

    Not Religious 1,139 18.0 107 11.7

    Religious 5,191 82 811 88.3

Blood Pressure Control Status 0.000*

    Irregularly 5,328 84.2 514 56.1

    Regularly 1,001 15.8 403 43.9

Health Care Satisfaction 0.000*

    Low 1,553 24.5 284 30.9

    High 4,777 75.5 634 69.1

Happiness Status 0.210

    Unhappy 737 11.6 120 13.1

    Happy 5,593 88.4 798 86.9

Insomnia 0.000*

    Yes 2,858 45.2 423 46.1

    No 3,472 54.8 495 53.9

Depressive Symptoms Status 0.000*

    Not Depressed 5,091 80.4 677 73.7

    Depressed 1,239 19.6 241 26.3

* Included in initial multivariate model.

In the multivariate model, the elderly (OR: 1.60; 95% CI: 1.36–1.88) and subjects with low satisfaction with health care (OR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.08–1.51) were associated with low awareness of hypertension treatment. Interestingly, subjects with high religiosity were likely to exhibit low awareness of hypertension treatment (OR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.24–1.94). Modifiable factors associated with low awareness of hypertension treatment were having depressed symptoms (OR: 1.35; 95% CI: 1.12–1.62), having insomnia (OR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.11–1.53), and blood pressure control status (OR: 4.40; 95% CI: 3.78–5.13). Irregular blood pressure control exhibited the highest odds of low awareness of hypertension treatment (Table 3). The goodness-of-fit p-value of the model was 0.271 with a pseudo-R-squared value of 8.74%. Overall, modifiable and non-modifiable factors that were associated with low awareness of hypertension treatment were relatively similar in subgroup analysis, except that insomnia and depressive symptom status were not seen as risk factors for low awareness of hypertension treatment among subjects with more than four comorbidities (Table 3).

Table 3

Association between Modifiable and Non-modifiable Factors with Low Awareness of Hypertension Treatment with Subgroup Analysis Result.


CHARACTERISTIC OVERALLa SUBGROUP ANALYSIS: NO COMORBIDITIES SUBGROUP ANALYSIS: 1–3 COMORBIDITIES SUBGROUP ANALYSIS: ≥4 COMORBIDITIES




OR [95% CI]b P-VALUE OR [95% CI] P-VALUE OR [95% CI] p-value OR [95% CI] p-value

Age

    Non-elderly(<60 years old) Reference Reference Reference Reference

    Elderly (≥60 years old) 1.60 [1.36–1.88] 0.000 1.72 [1.30–2.29] 0.000 1.82 [1.42–2.32] 0.000 1.34 [0.39–4.61] 0.641*

Blood Pressure Control Status

    Regularly Reference Reference Reference Reference

    Irregularly 4.40 [3.78–5.13] 0.000 3.47 [2.63–4.60] 0.000 4.48 [3.54–5.69] 0.000 2.14 [0.64–7.16] 0.219*

Depressive Symptoms Status

    Not Depressed Reference Reference Reference Reference

    Depressed 1.35 [1.12–1.62] 0.002 1.04 [0.73–1.48] 0.821* 1.37 [1.04–1.82] 0.028 0.50 [0.10–2.47] 0.398*

Insomnia

    No Reference Reference Reference Reference

    Yes 1.31 [1.11–1.53] 0.001 1.46 [1.02–2.09] 0.041 1.19 [0.86–1.66] 0.293* 1.09 [0.21–5.74] 0.916*

Health Care Satisfaction

    High Reference Reference Reference Reference

    Low 1.28 [1.08–1.51] 0.003 1.27 [0.94–1.71] 0.114* 1.14 [0.88–1.47] 0.324* 0.60 [0.16–2.21] 0.442*

Religiosity

    Not Religious Reference Reference Reference Reference

    Religious 1.55 [1.24–1.94] 0.000 1.75 [1.14–2.68] 0.011 1.56 [1.09–2.22] 0.016 2.29 [0.38–13.70] 0.036*

a Goodness-of-fit p-value: 0.271; pseudo-R-squared: 8.74%.

b Final multivariate model.

* Not significant.

Discussion

Among the 7,920 respondents, 87.1% reported low awareness of hypertension treatment. Age and religiosity are non-modifiable factors associated with low awareness of hypertension treatment. Meanwhile, the modifiable factors are blood pressure control status, satisfaction with health care, depressive symptoms, and insomnia. Medication awareness is critical in providing accurate information about the treatment undertaken to improve medication adherence [31]. Patients with low awareness of treatment tend to be non-adherent to treatment for chronic diseases [32]. Medication awareness is one of the five broad categories of treatment-related problems in a patient perspective that have potential implications for therapeutic success as they create barriers to medication adherence [33]. However, low adherence to treatment in chronic disease is associated with poor disease control, increased costs, increased hospitalization rates, decreased quality of life, and increased mortality [34, 35, 36, 37].

We observed that the elderly subjects were associated with low awareness of hypertension treatment, which can be partially explained by several possible barriers, such as frailty, multiple comorbidities, polypharmacy, and cognitive impairment [38]. Surprisingly, religiosity indicated a significant association with low awareness of hypertension treatment. A possible explanation may be that people foresee and surrender healing outcomes from God. Thus, they would risk not being aware of taking medications [39, 40]. In addition, previous studies reported that religiosity could increase the likelihood of using complementary and alternative medical (CAM) practices, such as herbal medicines [41, 42]. The high prevalence of CAM among patients in Ethiopia with hypertension is associated with low awareness of health care, which potentially leads to ineffective hypertension management [43]. Another finding from a previous study reported decreased adherence to prescribed medication due to CAM use in patients with type 2 diabetes [44].

We further observed that blood pressure control status, satisfaction with health care, depressive symptoms, and insomnia are associated with low hypertension awareness. Subjects who irregularly control their blood pressure have a risk of low awareness of hypertension treatment. A possible explanation for this finding may be that the inadequate understanding of therapeutic goals influences their awareness of hypertension treatment [45]. Affordability and unreliable devices are the two main reasons why patients do not check their blood pressure regularly [46]. Individual medical education is the most critical aspect of blood pressure regulation [47]. The fundamental method for hypertension control is to make people more aware of it, treat it, and maintain it under control [48]. The problem of achievement of target blood pressure consists of patient-related barrier, physician-related barrier, and health care system-related barrier, so that a team-based approach to blood pressure control that involves nurses, pharmacists, and physician assistants should be emphasized [49]. People with high blood pressure can benefit from antihypertensive medication, while complications and aging make it less probable to achieve the desired blood pressure [47].

We also observed that patients with low satisfaction with health care were likely to display low awareness of hypertension treatment. Previous studies revealed that satisfaction with health care was associated with adherence to hypertension treatment [50, 51]. Subjects with better satisfaction with health care may increase their awareness of hypertension treatment. Furthermore, having a depressive status was associated with low awareness of hypertension treatment, which can be partially explained by the deterioration of high-level cognitive functions, specifically attention, awareness, and memory, among subjects with depressive symptoms [52]. At the same time, having depressive disorders has been associated with hypertension [53, 54, 55]. A systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that the risk for cardiovascular diseases in subjects with depressive symptoms is approximately two times higher than those in non-depressed people [56]. Similar results were observed in subjects with insomnia. A possible explanation is that the severe decrease in sleep hours is related to cognitive function, which leads to the lack of awareness of treatment. Prior studies have reported a significant relationship between sleep duration and cognitive function [57, 58]. This finding indicates the need to screen for sleep impairment and to maintain regular sleep patterns.

Hypertension frequently coexists with diabetes, hyperlipidemia, or other metabolic syndromes [59]. Patients with these comorbidities are more likely to require combination therapy, which needs more medications. The result of subgroup analysis showed that both subgroups had relatively similar modifiable and non-modifiable factors that were associated with low awareness of hypertension treatment. Therefore, health care providers need to pay more attention to patients with low awareness regardless of their number of comorbidities.

In summary, the majority of sociodemographics as non-modifiable factors were not associated with low awareness of hypertension treatment. Sociodemographics such as marital status may be extremely general for predicting the medication awareness of subjects. No association was found between gender and low awareness of hypertension, as reported in a previous study [60]. In general, gender is seemingly a less meaningful factor associated with low awareness of hypertension treatment. Moreover, the level of education is not associated with awareness, which is similar to the findings of previous studies [61, 62]. Thus, health literacy may be more important than level of education [62]. By contrast, another study indicated that low levels of education were associated with low awareness of hypertension in LMICs [5]. We observed that residency was not associated with low awareness of hypertension treatment. This finding is in contrast with that of a previous study [63], which found an association between people living in urban areas and high awareness of hypertension treatment. Population in urban areas has exhibited better treatment-seeking behavior and has easy access to health care [63]. Notably, the current study observed no association between visits to health care facilities with low awareness of hypertension treatment. In contrast, a study using IFLS-4 indicated that the number of visits to any health care facility helped to increase awareness about hypertension [64]. Furthermore, no association was found between happiness status and low awareness of hypertension treatment. This result is consistent with data obtained in a cohort study with a 31-year follow-up in London, which revealed the lack of robust associations between life satisfaction and incident hypertension [65]. One unexpected finding is that health insurance coverage was not associated with low awareness of hypertension treatment. However, one could expect that the limited subjects had health coverage in 2014 since the Indonesian National Health Insurance System began in 2014. Moreover, other studies reported on the positive effect of health insurance coverage due to the reduced cost of receiving health care services [66, 67].

The current finding suggests that the majority of non-modifiable factors may be insufficient to address the low awareness of hypertension treatment. Thus, health care professionals should consider modifiable factors in designing tailored and personalized interventions by implementing open communication to educate and to understand patients’ views regarding patients’ and family members’ involvement in the treatment to improve patients’ health outcomes [68]. Education and counseling are effective in terms of behavioral changes in patients to clarify misperceptions and improve the awareness of hypertension treatment [69]. Furthermore, health care professionals should to regularly check blood pressure and consider patient satisfaction by providing correct treatment and creating a respectful and caring relationship with patients by sharing the decision-making process [70]. The current findings may serve as reference for health professionals focusing on factors related to low awareness of hypertension treatment that should be addressed (Figure 1).

Problems, Challenges, and Solutions to Increase Low awareness of Hypertension Treatment in Indonesia
Figure 1 

Problems, Challenges, and Solutions to Increase Low awareness of Hypertension Treatment in Indonesia.

The strength of this study is that we used IFLS data, which represents 83% of the Indonesian population with a small attrition rate (6%). However, we acknowledge certain limitations related to methodological issues. First, the study was unable to provide causal inferences regarding the association between modifiable and non-modifiable factors related to low awareness of hypertension treatment due to the cross-sectional design. Second, we used complete case analysis, which may reduce statistical power due to the sample size, which can produce biased estimates, leading to overestimating or underestimating conclusions. Third, in this analysis, we included only subjects with a blood pressure of more than 140/90 mmHg, which may lead to overestimating low awareness of hypertension treatment since subjects with controlled blood pressure (blood pressure <140/90 mmHg) are not included. Fourth, the overall association of our model was relatively low, which indicated the presence of other unmeasured factors that may influence the low awareness of hypertension treatment, such as education about hypertension, origins of subjects, local tradition, number of medication, medication beliefs [71], comorbid diseases [72], or healthy lifestyle [73].

Conclusions

The main factors associated with low awareness of hypertension treatment are modifiable. Thus, health care professionals should integrate more patient-specific factors when designing tailored interventions.

Funding Information

This study was supported by grant-in-aid from Universitas Padjadjaran. QAK is supported by a postgraduate scholarship (PMDSU Scholarship) from the Indonesian Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology.

Competing Interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Author Contributions

QAK wrote the first draft of this manuscript. SDA and RA participated in the design of the study. QAK and SDA participated in data analysis and interpretation. QAK, SDA, and RA contributed to the revision of the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript.

References

  1. Zhou B, Perel P, Mensah GA, Ezzati M. Global epidemiology, health burden and effective interventions for elevated blood pressure and hypertension. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021; 18: 785–802. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-021-00559-8 

  2. Zhou B, Carrillo-Larco RM, Danaei G, Riley LM, Paciorek CJ, Stevens GA, Gregg EW, et al. Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: A pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants. Lancet. 2021; 398(10304): 957–980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01330-1 

  3. Mills KT, Bundy JD, Kelly TN, Reed JE, Kearney PM, Reynolds K, Chen J, He J. Global disparities of hypertension prevalence and control: A systematic analysis of population-based studies from 90 countries. Circulation. 2016; 134(6): 441–450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018912 

  4. Mills KT, Stefanescu A, He J. The global epidemiology of hypertension. Physiol Behav. 2016; 176(1): 139–148. 

  5. Chow CK, Teo KK, Rangarajan S, Islam S, Gupta R, Avezum A, Bahonar A, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in rural and urban communities in high-, middle-, and low-income countries. J Am Med Assoc. 2013; 310(9): 959–968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.184182 

  6. World Health Organization. Indonesia: Noncommunicable diseases country profiles 2018 WHO. Geneva; 2018. https://www.who.int/nmh/publications/ncd-profiles-2018/en/ Accessed: December 21, 2021. 

  7. Kemenkes RI. Hasil Riset Kesehatan Dasar Tahun 2018. Vol. 53, Kementrian Kesehatan RI. Jakarta; 2018. 

  8. Yusuf S, Rangarajan S, Teo K, Islam S, Li W, Liu L, Bo J, et al. Cardiovascular risk and events in 17 low-, middle-, and high-income countries. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371(9): 818–827. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1311890 

  9. Ghembaza MA, Senoussaoui Y, Tani M, Meguenni K. Impact of patient knowledge of hypertension complications on adherence to antihypertensive therapy. Curr Hypertens Rev. 2014; 10(1): 41–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/157340211001141111160653 

  10. Turner BJ, Hollenbeak C, Weiner MG, Have TT, Roberts C. Barriers to adherence and hypertension control in a racially diverse representative sample of elderly primary care patients. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009; 18(5): 672–681. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.1766 

  11. Gheorghe A, Griffiths U, Murphy A, Legido-Quigley H, Lamptey P, Perel P. The economic burden of cardiovascular disease and hypertension in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2018; 18(1): 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5806-x 

  12. Finkelstein EA, Chay J, Bajpai S. The economic burden of self-reported and undiagnosed cardiovascular diseases and diabetes on Indonesian households. PLoS One. 2014; 9(6): e99572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099572 

  13. Kardas P, Lewek P, Matyjaszczyk M. Determinants of patient adherence: A review of systematic reviews. Front Pharmacol. 2013 July; 4: 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2013.00091 

  14. Maimaris W, Paty J, Perel P, Legido-Quigley H, Balabanova D, Nieuwlaat R, Mckee M. The influence of health systems on hypertension awareness, treatment, and control: A systematic literature review. PLoS Med. 2013; 10(7): e1001490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001490 

  15. Sujarwoto S, Maharani A. Participation in community-based health care interventions (CBHIs) and its association with hypertension awareness, control and treatment in Indonesia. PLoS One. 2020; 15(12): 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244333 

  16. Felix C, Baldeon ME, Zertuche F, Fornasini M, Paucar MJ, Ponce L, Rangarajan S, Yusuf S, Lopez-Jaramillo P. Low levels of awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in Andean communities of Ecuador. J Clin Hypertens. 2020; 22(9): 1530–1537. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.13982 

  17. Peltzer K, Pengpid S. The prevalence and social determinants of hypertension among adults in Indonesia: A cross-sectional population-based national survey. Int J Hypertens; 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5610725 

  18. Cifkova R, Fodor G, Wohlfahrt P. Changes in hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control in high-, middle-, and low-income countries: An update. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2016; 18(8): 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-016-0669-y 

  19. Strauss J, Witoelar F, Sikoki B. The fifth wave of the Indonesia Family Life Survey: Overview and field report: Volume 1. Fifth Wave Indones Fam Life Surv Overv F Rep. 2016 March; 1: 1–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/WR1143.1 

  20. Hussain MA, Al Mamun A, Reid C, Huxley RR. Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in Indonesian adults aged ≥40 years: Findings from the Indonesia Family Life Survey (IFLS). PLoS One. 2016; 11(8): 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160922 

  21. James PA, Oparil S, Carter BL, Cushman WC, Dennison-Himmelfarb C, Handler J, Lackland DT, et al. 2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: Report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). J Am Med Assoc. 2014; 311(5): 507–520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.284427 

  22. McAlister FA, Wilkins K, Joffres M, Leenen FHH, Fodor G, Gee M, Tremblay MS, Walker R, Johansen H, Campbell N. Changes in the rates of awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in Canada over the past two decades. CMAJ. 2011; 183(9): 1007–1013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.101767 

  23. Damasceno A, Azevedo A, Silva-Matos C, Prista A, Diogo D, Lunet N. Hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control in mozambique: Urban/rural gap during epidemiological transition. Hypertension. 2009; 54(1): 77–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.132423 

  24. Vrijens B, De Geest S, Hughes DA, Przemyslaw K, Demonceau J, Ruppar T, Dobbels F, et al. A new taxonomy for describing and defining adherence to medications. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012; 73(5): 691–705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04167.x 

  25. Vilagut G, Forero CG, Barbaglia G, Alonso J. Screening for depression in the general population with the center for epidemiologic studies depression (ces-d): A systematic review with meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2016; 11(5): 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155431 

  26. Björgvinsson T, Kertz SJ, Bigda-Peyton JS, McCoy KL, Aderka IM. Psychometric properties of the CES-D-10 in a psychiatric sample. Assessment. 2013; 20(4): 429–436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113481998 

  27. Yu L, Buysse DJ, Germain A, Moul DE, Stover A, Dodds NE, Johnston KL, Pikonis PA. Development of short forms from the PROMIS Sleep Disturbance and Sleep-Related Impairment item banks. Behav Sleep Med. 2011; 10(1): 6–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15402002.2012.636266 

  28. Peltzer K, Pengpid S. Prevalence, social and health correlates of insomnia among persons 15 years and older in Indonesia. Psychol Heal Med. 2019; 24(6): 757–768. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2019.1566621 

  29. IFLS-5. Buku Iii B. In: Survei Aspek Kehidupan Rumah Tangga Indonesia 2014. Jakarta: RAND; 2014. 

  30. Dodge Y. Chi-square goodness of fit test. In: The concise encyclopedia of statistics. New York: Springer. 2008; pp. 72–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-32833-1_55 

  31. Berkman ND, Sheridan SL, Donahue KE, Halpern DJ, Crotty K. Low health literacy and health outcomes: An updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2011; 155(2): 97–107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005 

  32. Mekonnen GB, Gelayee DA. Low medication knowledge and adherence to oral chronic medications among patients attending community pharmacies: A cross-sectional study in a low-income country. Biomed Res Int. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4392058 

  33. Gordon K, Smith F, Dhillon S. Effective chronic disease management: Patients’ perspectives on medication-related problems. Patient Educ Couns. 2007; 65(3): 407–415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2006.09.012 

  34. Cutler RL, Fernandez-Llimos F, Frommer M, Benrimoj C, Garcia-Cardenas V. Economic impact of medication non-adherence by disease groups: A systematic review. BMJ Open. 2018; 8(1): e016982. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016982 

  35. Ip Q, Malone DC, Chong J, Harris RB, Labiner DM. Economic impact of epilepsy and the cost of nonadherence to antiepileptic drugs in older Medicare beneficiaries. Epilepsy Behav. 2018; 80: 208–214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.01.009 

  36. Desai R, Nayak R. Effects of medication nonadherence and comorbidity on health resource utilization in schizophrenia. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019; 25(1): 37–44A. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.1.037 

  37. Alfian SD, Sukandar H, Lestari K, Abdulah R. Medication adherence contributes to an improved quality of life in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: A cross-sectional study. Diabetes Ther Res Treat Educ Diabetes Relat Disord. 2016; 7(4): 755–764. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-016-0203-x 

  38. Lee JH, Kim K-IL, Cho MC. Current status and therapeutic considerations of hypertension in the elderly. Korean J Intern Med. 2019; 34(4): 687–695. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2019.196 

  39. Kretchy I, Owusu-Daaku F, Danquah S. Spiritual and religious beliefs: Do they matter in the medication adherence behaviour of hypertensive patients? Biopsychosoc Med. 2013; 7(1): 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0759-7-15 

  40. Shahin W, Kennedy GA, Stupans I. The impact of personal and cultural beliefs on medication adherence of patients with chronic illnesses: A systematic review. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019; 13: 1019–1035. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S212046 

  41. Albuquerque UP, Ferreira Júnior WS, Sousa DCP, Reinaldo RCPS, do Nascimento ALB, Gonçalves PHS. Religiosity/spirituality matters on plant-based local medical system. J Relig Health. 2018; 57(5): 1948–1960. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-018-0634-y 

  42. Frazão-Moreira A. The symbolic efficacy of medicinal plants: Practices, knowledge, and religious beliefs amongst the Nalu healers of Guinea-Bissau. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2016; 12(1): 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-016-0095-x 

  43. Asfaw Erku D, Basazn Mekuria A. Prevalence and correlates of complementary and alternative medicine use among hypertensive patients in Gondar Town, Ethiopia. Evidence-Based Complement Altern Med. 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6987636 

  44. Alfian SD, Sukandar H, Arisanti N, Abdulah R. Complementary and alternative medicine use decreases adherence to prescribed medication in diabetes patients. J Acupunct Meridian Stud. 2018; 11(5): 337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jams.2018.10.002 

  45. Li H, Yan X, Deng X, Yang L, Zhao S, Zou J, Luo Y, Cao S. A cross-sectional study of the prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in Shenzhen, China. BMJ Open. 2017; 7(6): 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015206 

  46. Turana Y, Tengkawan J, Soenarta AA. Asian management of hypertension: Current status, home blood pressure, and specific concerns in Indonesia. J Clin Hypertens. 2020; 22(3): 483–485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.13681 

  47. Kiselev AR, Posnenkova OM, Belova OA, Romanchuk SV, Popova YV, Prokhorov MD, Gridnev VI. Impact of clinical factors on the achievement of target blood pressure in hypertensive patients from Ivanovo Region of Russia: Data of 2015. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2017; 24(4): 425–435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40292-017-0227-y 

  48. Carey RM, Muntner P, Bosworth HB, Whelton PK. Prevention and control of hypertension: JACC Health Promotion Series. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 72(11): 1278–1293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.008 

  49. Odedosu T, Schoenthaler A, Vieira DL, Agyemang C, Ogedegbe G. Overcoming barriers to hypertension control in African Americans. Cleve Clin J Med. 2012; 79(1): 46–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.79a.11068 

  50. Jneid S, Jabbour H, Hajj A, Sarkis A, Licha H, Hallit S, Khabbaz LR. Quality of life and its association with treatment satisfaction, adherence to medication, and trust in physician among patients with hypertension: A cross-sectional designed study. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2018; 23(6): 532–542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1074248418784292 

  51. Świątoniowska-Lonc N, Polański J, Tański W, Jankowska-Polańska B. Impact of satisfaction with physician-patient communication on self-care and adherence in patients with hypertension: Cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020; 20(1): 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05912-0 

  52. Botha E, Gwin T, Purpora C. The effectiveness of mindfulness based programs in reducing stress experienced by nurses in adult hospital settings: a systematic review of quantitative evidence protocol. JBI database Syst Rev Implement reports. 2015; 13(10): 21–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2380 

  53. Zhang Y, Chen Y, Ma L. Depression and cardiovascular disease in elderly: Current understanding. J Clin Neurosci. 2018; 47: 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2017.09.022 

  54. Meng L, Chen D, Yang Y, Zheng Y, Hui R. Depression increases the risk of hypertension incidence: A meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. J Hypertens. 2012; 30(5): 842–851. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0b013e32835080b7 

  55. Hare DL, Toukhsati SR, Johansson P, Jaarsma T. Depression and cardiovascular disease: A clinical review. Eur Heart J. 2014; 35(21): 1365–1372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht462 

  56. Read JR, Sharpe L, Modini M, Dear BF. Multimorbidity and depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2017; 221: 36–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.06.009 

  57. Lian Y, Zhang J, Jia CX. Sleep duration change and cognitive function: A national cohort study of Chinese people older than 45 years. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2020; 208(6): 498–504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000001159 

  58. Hua J, Sun H, Shen Y. Improvement in sleep duration was associated with higher cognitive function: a new association. Aging (Albany NY). 2020; 12(20): 20623–20635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.103948 

  59. Unger T, Borghi C, Charchar F, Khan NA, Poulter NR, Prabhakaran D, Ramirez A, et al. 2020 International Society of Hypertension Global Hypertension practice guidelines. Hypertension. 2020; 75(6): 1334–1357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15026 

  60. Odili AN, Chori BS, Danladi B, Nwakile PC, Okoye IC, Abdullahi U, Nwegbu MN, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in Nigeria: Data from a nationwide survey 2017. Glob Heart. 2020; 15(1): 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.848 

  61. Mirzaei M, Mirzaei M, Bagheri B, Dehghani A. Awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension and related factors in adult Iranian population. BMC Public Health. 2020; 20(1): 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08831-1 

  62. Olives C, Myerson R, Mokdad AH, Murray CJL, Lim SS. Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in United States Counties, 2001–2009. PLoS One. 2013; 8(4): e60308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060308 

  63. Yip W, Wong TY, Jonas JB, Zheng Y, Lamoureux EL, Nangia V, Sabanayagam C. Prevalence, awareness, and control of hypertension among Asian Indians living in urban Singapore and rural India. J Hypertens. 2013; 31(8): 1539–1546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0b013e328361d52b 

  64. Sohn K. Sick but unaware: Hypertension in Indonesia. Soc Biodemography Soc Biol. 2015; 61(3): 298–318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19485565.2015.1091719 

  65. Guimond AJ, Kubzansky LD, Boehm JK, Kivimaki M, Trudel-Fitzgerald C. Does life satisfaction reduce risk of incident hypertension and stroke? Evidence from the Whitehall II cohort. J Psychosom Res. 2021; 144: 1–9. November 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110414 

  66. Christiani Y, Byles JE, Tavener M, Dugdale P. Health insurance coverage among women in Indonesia’s major cities: A multilevel analysis. Health Care Women Int. 2017; 38(3): 267–282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2016.1253697 

  67. Gebru T, Lentiro K. The impact of community-based health insurance on health-related quality of life and associated factors in Ethiopia: A comparative cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018; 16(1): 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-018-0946-3 

  68. Romain M, Sprung CL. Approaches to patients and families with strong religious beliefs regarding end-of-life care. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2014; 20(6): 668–672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000000148 

  69. Aulia G, Halimah E, Lestari K. Pharmaceutical counseling has a positive impact on quality of life of hypertension patients. Pharmacol Clin Pharm Res. 2018; 3(1): 5–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15416/pcpr.v3i1.16449 

  70. Graham B. Defining and measuring patient satisfaction. J Hand Surg Am. 2016; 41(9): 929–931. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.07.109 

  71. Alfian SD, Annisa N, Fajriansyah F, Perwitasari DA, Abdulah R, Hak E, Denig P. Modifiable factors associated with non-adherence to antihypertensive or antihyperlipidemic drugs are dissimilar: A multicenter study among patients with diabetes in Indonesia. J Gen Intern Med. 2020; 35(10): 2897–2906. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-05809-y 

  72. Fenech G, Vallée A, Cherfan M, Kab S, Goldberg M, Zins M, Blacher J. Poor awareness of hypertension in France: The CONSTANCES population-based study. Am J Hypertens. 2020; 33(6): 543–551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hpaa018 

  73. Villalva CM, Alvarez-Muiño XLL, Mondelo TG, Fachado AA, Fernández JC. Adherence to treatment in hypertension. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017; 956: 129–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/5584_2016_77 

comments powered by Disqus