Hypertension has been identified as the most common comorbidity among COVID-19 patients . Hypertension becomes more prevalent with age and is often associated with other risk factors such as obesity, diabetes, hyperlipidemia [1, 2]. Evidence suggests also that older patients and patients with comorbidities such as obesity, diabetes or cardiovascular diseases may have a more severe course of COVID-19 . Severe COVID-19 is defined as hospitalization, admission to the ICU, intubation or mechanical ventilation, or death . A history of hypertension has been shown to increase odds of hospitalization and severe illness twofold. A similar increase was seen with diabetes and chronic lung disease (OR = 2.2), fever (OR = 2.89) and, obesity (OR = 1.8–3.7) [2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. The presence of hypertension has also been associated with longer hospital stays, and intubation [5, 7]. However, it is still under investigation whether arterial hypertension per se is a risk factor for a more severe course of COVID-19 disease and whether control of hypertension mitigates this risk compared to uncontrolled hypertension.
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether lone hypertension is associated with increased mortality or a more severe course of COVID-19, and if treatment and control of hypertension mitigates this risk. We hypothesized that lone hypertension is associated with increased mortality or a more severe course of COVID-19, and that treatment and control of hypertension mitigates this risk compared to uncontrolled hypertension.
This is a prospective multi-center observational cohort study with 30-day outcomes from 12,948 consecutive patients with confirmed a SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive. Patients had first medical evaluation in the Tashkent COVID-19 distribution centers, with 30 day follow-up after treatment in 46 outpatient state clinics of Tashkent, the capital of Uzbekistan, during the period of June 1-September 30, 2020.
In this study, 12,948 consecutive patients with baseline characteristics of all confirmed COVID-19 patients were included and data were retrieved on the day of the first visit to the Tashkent COVID-19 distribution centers after the onset of clinical symptoms. Of them, 9,531 patients were ≥ 18 years old (41.9 ± 9.7years, 49.2% male), and were included in the data analysis. Patients who were seeking medical care through emergency services and people using the private health care sector were not included in the study due to separate regulations for data availability and surveillance systems.
Before June 1, 2020, all patients with the confirmed COVID-19 status based on RT-PCR were immediately admitted to the hospitals regardless of symptoms. Since June 1, the management of COVID-19 patients was organised at the COVID-19 distribution centers due to progressively increased number of infected patients and overload of hospitals beds allocated to treat COVID-19 patients. This was done in accordance with the Presidential Decree No. R-5537, which was aimed to combat COVID-19 in Uzbekistan . After exam, CT scan, and laboratory tests, if mild COVID-19 course, patients were referred to outpatient clinics; if moderately severe, patients might stay under the supervision of medical personnel for 1–5 days; if severe, patients were admitted to the COVID-19 hospitals. ICU units had been organized at the distribution centers for patients who required critical care.
The active surveillance and follow-up response system was established on the basis of outpatient clinics to monitor patients’ conditions daily until symptoms resolved for outpatients and within at least 30 days after dispatch from distribution centers or hospitals. Management of COVID-19 patients in hospital, at the distribution centers, and outpatient clinics, including testing, exams, and medications was completely free of charge for patients and covered by the government of Uzbekistan.
All patients with COVID-19 infection diagnosis met the following criteria: positive SARS-COV-2 RNA by RT-PCR, plus fever, respiratory and/or other symptoms. In case of abnormal lung sounds, chest CT scan or X-ray was performed. The clinical classification of patients was based on the Interim Guidelines for the Management of Patients Infected with COVID-19 (7th ed.) developed by the Ministry of Health of Uzbekistan, adopted from the temporary guidelines of the WHO . Clinical classification of the COVID-19 course was the following: 1) mild clinical symptoms; 2) moderately severe patients who had not signs of severe COVID-19; 3) severe course with signs of respiratory distress, respiratory rate ≥ 30 beats/min, mean oxygen saturation ≤ 93% at rest; 4) critically severe patients were defined if intensive or critical care treatment, e.g. mechanical ventilation, vasopressor therapy required.
Baseline characteristics of confirmed COVID-19 patients were retrieved on the day of the exam at the COVID-19 distribution centers. Patient’s risk factors such as obesity, history of cardiovascular disease (CVD), history of diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma were assessed along with socio-economic factors, lifestyle risk factors such as self-reported smoking status, physical activity, and nutrition. Diabetes was defined by a hemoglobin HbA1C ≥ 6.5%, history of physician based diagnosis, or use of anti-diabetic medications according to 2019 ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases . Smoking was defined as current (tobacco products used within the last month), occasional or never . Coronary artery disease was defined according to the 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes . In adults (age over 18 years) obesity was defined by a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m [2, 12]. Lungs CT scan was conducted for suspected pneumonia.
Blood pressure (BP) was measured after some rest, in sitting position, at the beginning and at the end of the healthcare providers exam in both arms, the mean of two measurements was used [3, 13, 14]. The main analysis was conducted based on BP and history of antihypertensive therapy. Patients were subdivided into six hypertension groups according to guidelines of the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC8) :
Patients were considered treated if they had previously established diagnosis of arterial hypertension, and had received prescriptions of medications within 90 days before visiting the outpatient clinic due to COVID-19 symptoms. The patients’ hypertension treatment of antihypertensive medications, such as angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), angiotensin receptors blockers (ARB), calcium channel blockers (CCB), beta-blockers (BB), diuretics and others were recorded. The patient was considered untreated if hypertension was not previously diagnosed (based on the patient history/charts), if the patient was aware of having hypertension but did not take prescribed medications or used ad hoc only in case of ‘emergency’. (Table 1).
|TITLE OF THE GROUP JNC8||BLOOD PRESSURE SYSTOLIC/DIASTOLIC, MMHG||N||%|
We specified three outcomes that represented severe cases of COVID-19: 1) Hospital admission for one or more nights. 2) ICU admission for one or more nights. 3) All-cause mortality within 30 days. Patients’ survival/death was confirmed by the follow-up data of the outpatient clinics as well as with vital statistics.
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (v27, IBM, Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics for studied variables are presented as mean±SD (standard deviation) for normally distributed continuous variables, median with interquartile range for non-normally distributed continuous variables and frequency with percentage for categorical variables. Variables were compared with independent Student t-tests for normally distributed continuous data, and Chi-square test for categorical data. Differences between groups were determined by a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), with a subsequent Tukey’s/Dunnet C post hoc test. There were no loss of follow-up unless patients death.
The association of risk factors and hospital admission as well as 30-day all-cause mortality was assessed using multivariate logistic regression to examine how variables predict an outcome in the main analysis (six hypertension groups based on the JNC8) . Univariable analysis of each risk factor (group of arterial hypertension, age, sex, history of obesity, diabetes, obstructive CVD, prior cases of acute coronary syndrome, e.g. myocardial infarction (MI), history COPD or asthma) was assessed separately. In the multivariable analysis, we adjusted all selected covariates with the reference for the categorical variable as normal blood pressure, no obesity, no diabetes, no MI, etc). Variables used in the analysis did not have missing data. To bring statistical power we analyzed 3,087 patients who were 50 years old and older. The statistical test did not show any significant difference for any stage of hypertension, thus the results are presented for the entire cohort.
We also conducted a sensitivity analysis to show the differences on the outcomes between the presence vs. no hypertension per se (Supplement 1–3). We also tested the hypotheses whether controlled or uncontrolled hypertension compare with no hypertension were associated with severe COVID-19. Controlled means BP < 140/90 during study visit or hospitalization and irrespective of treatment. Treatment was used only within the definition of hypertension (Supplement 4–7). We also conducted additional regression analysis stratified by gender (Supplement 8). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression to examine the association between 30-day mortality and baseline characteristics in COVID-19 patients is shown in the Supplement 9.
The study population consisted of 9,531 consecutive patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection. Over 96% of patients had a first medical contact within two days of onset of symptoms. Table 1 represents the distribution of the patients with COVID-19 divided into six hypertension groups according to JNC8 as per methods . Of the entire cohort, 2,442 out of 9,531 (25.6%) patients had hypertension, of them 1,344 (14.1%) were controlled (BP < 140/90 mmHg), and 1,098 (11.5%) uncontrolled (BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg). The prevalence of stage-1 and stage-2 hypertension was 2,266 out of 9,531 patients (23.8%). ACEI inhibitors were most commonly prescribed antihypertensive medications, followed by ARBs and BBs (Table 2).
|NORMAL N = 6,697||ELEVATED N = 568||STAGE-1 UNTREATED N = 457||STAGE-1 TREATED N = 711||STAGE-2 UNTREATED N = 233||STAGE-2 TREATED N = 865||TOTAL N = 9,531|
|Age (years), mean ± SD||35.9 ± 13.1||43.4 ± 11.3||51.8 ± 10.9||57.3 ± 10.1||61.4 ± 7.7||65.9 ± 9.7||41.9 ± 9.7|
|Age ≥ 65 years, n (%)||236 (3.5)||23 (4.0)||44 (9.6)||143 (20.1)||85 (35.6)||428 (49.5)||959 (10.1)|
|Sex, n (%)|
|Male||3347 (50.0)||305 (53.7)||209 (45.7)||300 (42.2)||109 (46.8)||420 (48.6)||4,689 (49.2)|
|Female||3350 (50.0)||263 (46.3)||248 (54.3)||411 (57.8)||124 (53.2)||445 (51.4)||4,842 (50.8)|
|Course of COVID-19 disease|
|Mild||3,677 (54.9)||232 (40.8)||159 (34.8)||298 (41.9)||11 (4.7)||343 (39.7)||4,720 (49.5)|
|Moderately severe||2,599 (38.8)||212(37.3)||135 (29.5)||281 (39.5)||72 (30.9)||331 (38.3)||3,630 (38.1)|
|Severe||401 (5.9)||116 (20.4)||153 (33.4)||110 (15.4)||122 (52.3)||147 (17.0)||1,049 (11.0)|
|Critical (ICU admission)||20 (0.3)||8 (1.41)||10 (2.2)||22 (3.1)||28 (12.02)||44 (5.1)||132 (1.38)|
|History of myocardial infarction||136 (2.0)||36 (6.3)||44 (9.6)||73 (10.3)||39 (16.7)||206 (24.0)||534 (5.6)|
|Obesity||575 (8.6)||225 (39.6)||156 (34.1)||255 (35.2)||125 (53.6)||350 (40.5)||1,686 (17.7)|
|Diabetes||262 (3.9)||65 (11.4)||115 (25.2)||155 (21.8)||115 (49.5)||310 (35.8)||1,022 (10.7)|
|ACEI||189 (2.8)||141 (24.8)||92 (20.1)||435 (61.2)||42 (18.0)||503 (58.2)||1,387 (14.6)|
|ARB||96 (1.4)||45 (7.9)||71 (15.5)||198 (27.8)||35 (15.0)||395 (45.7)||840 (8.8)|
|CCB||49 (0.7)||38 (6.7)||30 (6.6)||87 (12.2)||18 (7.7)||152 (17.6)||374 (3.9)|
|BB||339 (5.1)||86(15.1)||66 (14.4)||275 (38.7)||39 (16.7)||407 (47.1)||1,192 (12.5)|
|Diuretics||121 (1.8)||25 (4.4)||32 (7.0)||48 (6.8)||16 (6.9)||88 (10.2)||330 (3.5)|
|Duration of COVID-19, days1||8.7 ± 6.0||12.9 ± 7.8||14.9 ± 9.3||12.4 ± 7.7||21.9 ± 9.4||14.6± 8.2||10.4 ± 7.3|
|Hospitalisation||424 (6.33)||120 (21.13)||129 (28.23)||142 (19.9)||144 (61.8)||224 (25.9)||1,183 (12.4)|
|Stay in hospital, days||9.4 ± 3.7||9.4 ± 3.8||9.3 ± 2.6||12.3 ± 4.7||11.4 ± 3.7||12.1 ± 5.0||10.5 ± 4.2|
|Stay in ICU, days||3.6 ± 3.4||3.4 ± 1.2||2.8 ± 1.3||4.1 ± 2.2||5.3 ± 3.1||5.0 ± 3.6||4.4 ± 3.1|
|All-cause mortality 30-days||13 (0.19)||8 (1.41)||0||18 (2.53)||14 (6.01)||59 (6.82)||112 (1.18)|
Age gradually increased from patients with normal BP to stage-2 hypertension mostly due to higher prevalence of people 65 years old and older (p < 0.001). A similar tendency between groups was observed for patients with obstructive CAD (p < 0.001). Patients from the hypertension stage-2 untreated group had greater prevalence of diabetes, obesity and/or symptomatic CAD (Table 2).
During the course of COVID-19, 1,183 out of9,531 patients (12.41%) required at least one day of in-hospital treatment. Patients with stage-2 untreated hypertension had the highest hospitalization rate among all groups with 144 out of 233 (61.8%), following by stage-1 untreated with 129 out of 457 (28.2%), and stage-2 treated group with 224 out of 865 (25.9%). The hospital stay was longer in patients with stage-2 hypertension, and stage-1 treated (one-way ANOVA, was significant, F (5, 1177) = 24.3, p < 0.001, for pairwise combinations).
The multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to present unadjusted and the adjusted effect of confounders (six hypertension groups according to JNC8 , age, sex, history of myocardial infarction, type-2 diabetes, obesity) to the hospital.
In the unadjusted model, all hypertension groups had significantly increased odds to be hospitalized with COVID-19 compared to the patients with normotensives (reference group). The greatest odds were in the case of having stage-2 untreated hypertension (OR = 23.91, 95%CI [18.03–31.7]), following by stage-2 treated and stage-1 untreated.
After adjusting for covariates, having stage-2 untreated hypertension remained significant and increased the odds of hospitalization 4.51-fold vs. normotensive patients (OR = 4.51, 95% CI [3.21–6.32], p < 0.001), stage-1 untreated hypertension (OR = 1.97, 95%CI [1.52–2.56]), and elevated BP group (OR = 1.82, 95%CI [1.42–2.34]) (Table 3). Stage 1 and 2 treated hypertension did not show statistically significant effect on hospitalization after adjusting for the confounders (Table 3). The greater odds of hospital admission in patients with untreated hypertension may be explained by greater prevalence of obesity, symptomatic CAD, and diabetes, as well as the fact that the patient who were aware of having hypertension but did not take prescribed medications or used ad hoc only in case of ‘emergency’ were included as untreated patients.
|AVAILABLE DATA IN THE UNIVARIABLE ANALYSIS N = 9,531||PATIENTS WHO WERE HOSPITALIZED N = 1,183||UNIVARIABLE||MULTIVARIABLE|
|CRUDE ODDS RATIO (95% CI)||P VALUE||ADJUSTED ODDS RATIO (95% CI)||P VALUE|
|Normal||6,697||424 (6.3)||1 (ref)||1 (ref)||..|
|Elevated||568||120 (21.1)||3.95 (3.16–4.95)||< 0.001||1.82 (1.42–2.34)||<0.001|
|Stage-1 untreated||457||129 (28.2)||5.81 (4.63–7.29)||< 0.001||1.97 (1.52–2.56)||<0.001|
|Stage-1 treated||711||142 (19.9)||3.68 (2.99–4.54)||< 0.001||0.91 (0.71–1.18)||0.492|
|Stage-2 untreated||233||144 (61.8)||23.91 (18.03–31.7)||< 0.001||4.51 (3.21–6.32)||<0.001|
|Stage-2 treated||865||224 (25.9)||5.17 (4.31–6.19)||< 0.001||0.78 (0.61–1.01)||0.061|
|Age, years||9,531||1.05 (1.05–1.06)||< 0.001||1.03(1.026–1.04)||<0.001|
|Male||4,689||545 (11.6)||1 (ref)||1 (ref)||..|
|Female||4,842||638 (13.2)||1.15 (1.02–1.30)||0.018||0.93 (0.98–1.30)||0.107|
|No||8,612||985 (11.4)||1 (ref)||1 (ref)||..|
|Yes||919||198 (21.5)||4.79 (3.98–5.78)||< 0.001||1.28 (0.98–1.30)||0.058|
|No||7,845||503 (6.4)||1 (ref)||1 (ref)||..|
|Yes||1,686||680 (40.3)||9.86 (8.63–11.26)||< 0.001||5.54 (4.78–6.44)||<0.001|
|No||8,509||735 (8.6)||1 (ref)||1 (ref)||..|
|Yes||1,022||448 (43.8)||8.26 (7.14–9.54)||< 0.001||3.35 (2.77–4.05)||<0.001|
The adjusted effect of age to increase chances of COVID-19 hospitalization remained statistically significant (OR = 1.03, 95%CI [1.03–1.04]). Obesity (having BMI > 30) increased odds for being hospitalized 5.54-fold (OR = 5.54, 95%CI [4.78–6.45]), type-2 diabetes 3.35-fold (OR = 3.35, 95% CI [2.77–4.05]), and history of myocardial infarction 1.28-fold (OR = 1.28, 95%CI [0.98–1.3]).
In the whole cohort 132 patients (1.38%) required at least 1 day of stay in the ICU. After adjusting for age, sex, history of myocardial infarction, type 2 diabetes, obesity, COPD/asthma, only having stage 2 untreated hypertension increased the odds of hospitalization (OR = 3.05, 95%CI [1.57–5.93]). Neither stage 1 or 2 treated hypertension patients or stage 1 untreated were at statistically significant increased risk for ICU admission after adjusting for confounders (Table 4). The adjusted effect of covariates on ICU admission remained significant: age (OR = 1.07, 95%CI [1.05–1.09]), obesity (OR = 5.61, 95%CI [3.55–8.88]), diabetes (OR = 4.19, 95% CI [2.74–6.40]), and history of myocardial infarction (OR1.76-fold (95%CI [1.11–2.79]).
|AVAILABLE DATA IN THE UNIVARIABLEANALYSIS N = 9,531||PATIENTS ADMITTED IN THE ICU N = 132||UNIVARIABLE||MULTIVARIABLE|
|CRUDE ODDS RATIO (95% CI)||P VALUE||ADJUSTED ODDS RATIO (95% CI)||P VALUE|
|Normal||6,697||20 (0.3)||1 (ref)||1 (ref)||..|
|Elevated||568||8 (1.4)||4.77 (2.09–10.88)||<0.001||1.58 (0.65 = 3.86)||0.309|
|Stage-1 untreated||457||10 (2.2)||7.47 (3.48–16.05)||<0.001||1.75 (0.79 = 3.85)||0.165|
|Stage-1 treated||711||22 (3.1)||10.66 (5.79–19.63)||<0.001||1.23 (0.62 = 2.43)||0.555|
|Stage-2 untreated||233||28 (12.0)||45.59 (25.26–82.29)||<0.001||3.05 (1.57 = 5.93)||0.001|
|Stage-2 treated||865||44 (5.1)||17.89 (10.49–30.50)||<0.001||0.95 (0.51 = 1.79)||0.880|
|Age, years||9,531||1.10 (1.09–1.12)||<0.001||1.07 (1.05 = 1.09)||< 0.001|
|Male||4,689||63 (1.3)||1 (ref)||1 (ref)||..|
|Female||4,842||69 (1.4)||1.06 (0.75–1.49)||0.734||0.86 (0.59 = 1.26)||0.441|
|No||8,612||88 (1.0)||1 (ref)||1 (ref)||..|
|Yes||919||44 (4.8)||9.09 (6.26–13.20)||<0.001||1.76 (1.11 = 2.79)||0.016|
|No||7,845||27 (0.3)||1 (ref)||1 (ref)||..|
|Yes||1,686||105 (6.2)||19.23 (12.56–29.45)||<0.001||5.61 (3.55 = 8.88)||< 0.001|
|No||8,509||43 (0.5)||1 (ref)||1 (ref)||..|
|Yes||1,022||89 (8.7)||18.78 (12.97–27.19)||<0.001||4.19 (2.74–6.40)||< 0.001|
In the whole cohort, all-cause mortality was 1.18% (112 out of 9,531). In the JNC8 stages mortality was 0.19% (n = 13) in normotensives, 1.41% (n = 8) in stage elevated, zero in stage-1 untreated, 2.53% (n = 18) in stage-1 treated, 6.01% (n = 14) in stage-2 untreated and 6.82% (n = 59) in stage-2 treated (Chi-square = 356.75; p < 0,001). After adjusting for age, sex, history of MI, type-2 diabetes, obesity, none of six JNC8 groups showed any significant difference in 30-day all-cause mortality (Table 4). However, age was associated with an increased risk of 30-day all-cause mortality (OR = 1.09, 95%CI [1.07–1.12], p < 0.001), obesity (OR = 7.18, 95%CI [4.18–12.44], p < 0.001), diabetes (OR 4.18, 95%CI [2.58–6.76], p < 0.001), and history of MI (OR = 2.68, 95%CI [1.67–4.31], p < 0.001). In the sensitivity test, being ≥ 65 years old increased mortality 10.56-fold (OR = 10.56, 95%CI [5.89–18.92], p < 0.001) (Table 5).
|AVAILABLE DATA IN THE UNIVARIABLE ANALYSIS N = 9,531||PATIENTS WHO DIED N = 112||UNIVARIABLE||MULTIVARIABLE|
|CRUDE ODDS RATIO (95% CI)||P VALUE||ADJUSTED ODDS RATIO (95% CI)||P VALUE|
|Normal||6,697||13 (0.2)||1 (ref)||1 (ref)||..|
|Elevated||568||8 (1.4)||7.35 (3.03–17.79)||<0.001||2.49 (0.94–6.64)||0.068|
|Stage-1 treated||711||18 (2.5)||13.35 (6.52–27.37)||<0.001||1.25 (0.56–2.81)||0.590|
|Stage-2 untreated||233||14 (6.0)||32.87 (15.27–70.76)||<0.001||1.73 (0.74–4.02)||0.203|
|Stage-2 treated||865||59 (6.8)||37.63 (20.55–68.92)||<0.001||1.49 (0.75–2.99)||0.258|
|Age, years||9,531||1.13 (1.11–1.15)||<0.001||1.09 (1.07–1.12)||< 0.001|
|Male||4,689||48 (1.0)||1 (ref)||1 (ref)||..|
|Female||4,842||64 (1.3)||1.29 (0.89–1.89)||0.178||0.97 (0.63–1.51)||0.909|
|No||8,612||57 (0.7)||1 (ref)||1 (ref)||..|
|Yes||919||55 (5.9)||18.01 (12.29–26.38)||<0.001||2.68 (1.67–4.31)||< 0.001|
|No||7,845||18 (0.2)||1 (ref)||1 (ref)||..|
|Yes||1,686||94 (5.6)||25.68 (15.46–42.63)||<0.001||7.18 (4.18–12.44)||< 0.001|
|No||8,509||31 (0.4)||1 (ref)||1 (ref)||..|
|Yes||1,022||81 (7.9)||23.54 (15.48–35.81)||<0.001||4.18 (2.58–6.76)||< 0.001|
Univariable and multivariable logistic regression to examine the association between 30-day all-cause mortality and baseline characteristics in COVID-19 patients stepwise is shown in the Supplement 9. After adjusting for age and obesity, only stage-2 untreated and treated hypertension significantly increased odds of 30-day all-cause mortality, (OR = 2.64, 95%CI [1.18–5.90], p = 0.019) and (OR = 2.06, 95%CI (1.06–4.01), p = 0.034); respectively. If adjusting only for age and diabetes, only stage-2 untreated hypertension remained significant (OR = 2.39, 95%CI [1.05–5.46], p = 0.037). However, after adjustment for age, diabetes and obesity none of six JNC8 groups showed any significant difference in 30-day all-cause mortality (Supplement 9).
In our study cohort, hypertension neither increased COVID-19 mortality nor the risk of hospitalization in patients with controlled BP. After adjusting for age, sex, coronary artery disease, history of myocardial infarction, type-2 diabetes, obesity, the presence of hypertension had no statistically significant effect of on 30-day all-cause mortality regardless of JNC8 BP stage (Figure 1). Thirty days after the onset of the first symptoms, 112 (1.18%) patients died. A total of 1,183 (12.4%) patients had to be hospitalized. Compared to the patients with normal BP, stage-2 untreated hypertension increased the odds for hospitalization 4.51-fold, stage 1 untreated hypertension 1.97-fold, and elevated BP 1.87-fold. The increased hospitalization rate in untreated BP groups remained significant after adjusting for confounders, such as age, sex, history of myocardial infarction, type-2 diabetes, and obesity. The reason for increased odds of hospitalization in patients with untreated hypertension is unclear. Conceivably the fact that hypertension has been associated with an increased risk of more severe outcome and fear of possible complications may have triggered hospitalization in some of these patients [15, 16, 17, 18]. More than 1-in-8 patients who had their exams at the COVID-19 distribution centers were subsequently referred to COVID-19 hospitals. This relatively high rate might be explained by the ordinance of the Ministry of Health to dispatch people to the allocated COVID-19 hospitals if any increased risk for complications is expected, and by the fact that treatment was free of charge for these patients. Our results confirm increased odds with age, obesity, history of diabetes and CVD for more severe course, admission to the hospital and 30-day all-cause mortality.
In regard to antihypertensive treatment, a recently published systematic review and meta-analysis including 31 cohort studies provided outcome data for 87,951 patients with COVID-19, of whom 22,383 out of 83,963 (26.7%) were on ACEI/ARB therapy . There was no differential effect for mortality/severe disease outcomes for patients who were on ACEI and ARB treatment, indicating that ACEI/ARB should not be discontinued. In our study, hypertension stage-2 untreated patients had a more severe course of the disease including longer duration of symptoms and higher hospitalization rates. A significant impact of obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases on hospital admission and all-cause mortality emphasizes the importance of preventive measures to improve short-term and long-term outcomes for COVID-19 patients.
The strength of this study is that this is a prospective observational cohort study including a large number of consecutive Covid-19 confirmed cases with no loss of 30-day follow-up. We assessed the impact of major comorbidities (e.g. age, hypertension, obesity, diabetes, history of myocardial infarction) on the course of COVID-19, outcomes (such as hospitalization and ICU admission), as well as 30-day all-cause mortality. The first physician exam was within two days from onset of symptoms in 96% of participants. Established active follow-up daily monitoring by the healthcare providers allowed responding quickly and hospitalizing patients if complications have been expected.
There are several limitations related to this study. One limitation is the relatively young study population which does not allow to extrapolate the results to older populations. However, if sensitivity tests were conducted on 3,087 patients who were 50 years old and older, the statistical analysis did not show any significant difference for any stage of hypertension as well, thus the results are presented for the entire cohort. The decisions for hospitalizations were very subjective and influenced by the fact that hospital cost were fully covered by the government. The fact that at the time of the study, the presence of hypertension was considered a risk factor for a more serious disease course may have influenced diagnostic and therapeutic decisions. Finally, this is an observational cohort study and there may be confounders which we have not been taken into consideration.
Hypertension by definition is a hemodynamic disorder. Lone hypertension did not increase COVID-19 mortality or in treated patients risk of ICU admission and hospitalization. Untreated hypertensive patients were at the increased risk of hospital admission. Once it is stripped of its common comorbidities such as age, obesity, diabetes, myocardial infarction, it carries little if any risk to increase mortality of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Data collected for the study, including deidentified individual participant data, a data dictionary defining each field in the set, and the statistical analysis plan will be made available to other researchers on request from the time of publication of this manuscript. Research proposals can besubmitted to the corresponding author (HS) at email@example.com and the first author (EVSh) at firstname.lastname@example.org.
The additional file for this article can be found as follows:Sensitivity analyses to test whether lone hypertension is a risk factor for more severe COVID-19 outcomes
The differences in the outcomes between the presence vs. no hypertension per se is shown in Supplement 1–3, whether controlled or uncontrolled hypertension compared with no hypertension were associated with severe COVID-19 (Supplement 4–7). Additional regression analysis stratified by gender is presented in Supplement 8. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression to examine the association between 30-day mortality and baseline characteristics in COVID-19 patients is shown in Supplement 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1099.s1
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Uzbekistan (1/6-1444; 2020). All participants provided written informed consent before being enrolled in the study.
The study was supported by grant #A-CC-021-112 funded by the Ministry of Innovative Development of Uzbekistan to cover data collection costs.
The authors have no competing interests to declare.
EVSh, AKSh, FLA, KhTM, FHM, OHF and HS designed the study. EVSh, AKSh, FLA, KhTM, enrolled the patients, followed up the patients, and acquired clinical data. EVSh, AKSh, FLA, KhTM, FHM, OHF and HS had access to the raw data and verified and analysed the data, data curation. EVSh, AKSh, FHM, OHF and HS for conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation. AKSh for funding acquisition. EVSh, AKSh, FLA for project administration and resources. AKSh, FHM, OHF and HS for project supervision. EVSh and HS drafted the manuscript. All authors revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content and approved the final version before submission.
Whelton PK, Williams B. The 2018 European society of cardiology/European society of hypertension and 2017 American college of cardiology/American heart association blood pressure guidelines: More similar than different. J Am Med Assoc. 2018; 320: 1749–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.16755
Garg S, Kim L, Whitaker M, et al. Hospitalization rates and characteristics of patients hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 — COVID-NET, 14 states, March 1–30, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020; 69: 458–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6915e3
CDC. Certain medical conditions and risk for severe COVID-19 illness. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-extra-precautions/people-with-medical-conditions.html (accessed 10 March 10 2021).
Kim L, Garg S, O’Halloran A, et al. Risk factors for intensive care unit admission and in-hospital mortality among hospitalized adults identified through the US coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated hospitalization surveillance network (COVID-NET). Clin Infect Dis. 2020; published online July 16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa1012
Yuan N, Ji H, Sun N, et al. Pseudo-safety in a cohort of patients with COVID-19 discharged home from the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2021; 1–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2020-210041
Huang Y, Lu Y, Huang YM, et al. Obesity in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Metabolism. 2020; 113: 154378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2020.154378
Kompaniyets L, Goodman AB, Belay B, et al. Body mass index and risk for COVID-19-related hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, invasive mechanical ventilation, and death—United States, March–December 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021; 70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7010e4
Order of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan. About formation of the special republican commission but preparation of the program of measures for the prevention…. https://cis-legislation.com/document.fwx?rgn=122506 (accessed 10 Feb 2021).
UZ Daily. Interim clinical guideline for the management of patients with mild COVID-19 at home approved. https://www.uzdaily.uz/en/post/58415 (accessed 10 Feb 2021).
Neumann FJ, Sechtem U, Banning AP, et al. 2019 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur. Heart J. 2020; 41: 407–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz486
Yumuk V, Tsigos C, Fried M, et al. European guidelines for obesity management in adults. Obes Facts. 2015; 8: 402–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000442721
Bakris G, Ali W, Parati G. ACC/AHA versus ESC/ESH on hypertension guidelines: JACC guideline comparison. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2019; 73: 3018–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.507
Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, et al. 2018 practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension of the European society of hypertension (ESH) and the European society of cardiology (ESC). Blood Press. 2018; 27: 314–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2018.1527177
Zhu J, Ji P, Pang J, et al. Clinical characteristics of 3062 COVID-19 patients: A meta-analysis. J Med Virol. 2020; 92: 1902–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25884
Al-Tawfiq JA, Leonardi R, Fasoli G, Rigamonti D. Prevalence and fatality rates of COVID-19: What are the reasons for the wide variations worldwide? Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2020; 35: 101711. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101711
Yang J, Zheng Y, Gou X, et al. Prevalence of comorbidities and its effects in coronavirus disease 2019 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Infect Dis. 2020; 94: 91–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.03.017
Bavishi C, Whelton PK, Mancia G, Corrao G, Messerli FH. Renin-angiotensin-system inhibitors and all-cause mortality in patients with coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Hypertens. 2021; published online Feb 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000002784